Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unfree Republic
Lew Rockwell ^ | 9/24/01 | Jeff Elkins

Posted on 09/24/2001 3:10:00 AM PDT by Ada Coddington

Unfree Republic
by Jeff Elkins

Let the stench of Middle East flesh reach Paradise reassuring them that these filth have gone to hell permanently."

The quote above is representative of many posted on the FreeRepublic.com site in the wake of the WTC attack, and unfortunately its like is not uncommon elsewhere. Americans are angry, predictably and rightly so, but just as predictable are the side effects. As always, that righteous anger will be accepted as a beloved gift by the state and molded into tools of oppression.

It’s funny how that works. Every single state-sponsored war the US has become embroiled in has resulted in an inexorable increase in the power of the state.

It’s also funny that it’s always assumed that human behavior in the past has no relation to how we behave today. Why those people were old-fashioned, we’re modern, educated, etc.

The beginning of this repeating pattern has already become public with the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security. It has an ominous sound, that name, almost Germanic. (I can’t wait to see the uniforms.)

On April 13, 1917, days after our entry into World War One, President Wilson created the Committee on Public Information to promote the war domestically while publicizing American war aims abroad. Bush has replicated that step, with this new cabinet-level department.

Under the leadership of journalistic muckraker George Creel, the CPI was a propaganda apparatus unparalleled at that point in world history. The CPI functioned as a de facto public censor, vetting nearly all published material about the war and helping to draft legislation such as the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. In the months prior to our entry into the war and especially after our entry when they were nearly criminal, antiwar viewpoints were rarely heard.

The same pattern emerges now: Penn. Gov. Tom Ridge will be President Bush’s George Creel, and just as in those dim days of yesteryear, he’ll have plenty of willing civilian accomplices. And after all, there’s so much more to censor -- Ridge will need all the help he can get. In seeking warriors for the front line of Internet censorship, Ridge needs look no farther than FreeRepublic.com. The atmosphere there is now poisonous.

Again, look back to Wilson's CPI. It encouraged businesses to spy on their employees, parents to spy on their children, children to spy on their parents, neighbors to spy on neighbors, and above all to report "disloyal," pro-German sentiments. State authorities banned the teaching of German in schools and changed German street names. As the madness mounted, those regarded as pro-German were hounded from their jobs, pressured to change their German names, beaten, and in a few cases lynched. Almost all cases of violence, while incited by the state, were carried out by "civilians" in the grip of war hysteria.

Along with this anti-German hysteria, Congress passed several measures designed to rigidly suppress criticism of the war. In particular, the Espionage Act, passed in June 1917, specified a fine of $10,000 or twenty years in prison for "whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully obstruct the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, and whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States, or the military or naval forces of the United States, or the flag."

The Espionage Act was very popular in its day. It was cheered on by mindless lemmings under the influence of state propaganda. Their great grandchildren now inhabit FreeRepublic.com, viciously attacking anyone who questions the wisdom of the state.

Our Congress is considering similar measures under the rubric of "anti-terrorism," and as it was at the beginning of the 20th Century, the FreeRepublic lemmings of the 21st are cheering the morally corrupt politicians along.

It’s not just message posters on the site. The management of FreeRepublic has instituted a "loose lips sink ships" campaign, with new moderators patrolling the forum to delete posts that in their opinion are detrimental to the "war effort."

The FreeRepublic mission statement claims "We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America."

Sanctimonious hogwash. Everything old is new again – the keyboard warriors of FreeRepublic would be right at home in 1917 shilling for Wilson.

September 24, 2001

Jeff Elkins is a freelance consultant and writer living in North Central Florida. His personal website is located at www.elkins.org.


TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 501-503 next last
To: JAWs
Just as a footnote. The LUSITANIA was transporting munitions, it apparently was basically a transport vessel maquerading as a liner, as was a sister ship in the Cunard (?) line. Whether or not you agree with the historical accuracy of those assertions, it is documentable fact that the German embassy attempted to publish a paid advertisement in 50 of the leading U.S. newspapers warning Americans not to travel on those liners because they were believed to carry munitions and would be U-boat targets. The U.S. State Department contacted the papers and asked them not to publish the ad. All but one (A St. Louis paper, I believe) complied. In what may have been his finest hour, William Jennings Bryan resigned his cabinet post in protest of the Wilson administration's action in this matter. It is further alleged [please note the qualification] that the British government, specifically W. Churchill, ordered the Lusitania, on its final voyage, to proceed without escort through known submarine infested waters.
181 posted on 09/24/2001 9:24:26 AM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Abundy
post 44, very well stated
182 posted on 09/24/2001 9:24:55 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
I've been away from a computer for a few hours; Thank you for that link, CJ.

Now if I can figure out how you did that...

Let me try it: Link to Jane's Report on Osama and the Qaeda

183 posted on 09/24/2001 9:26:43 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: DB
I believe Bush and Ashcroft (sp?) are honorable people and won't disappear people here

You totally missed his point, what happens when the next Bill Clinton takes over?

184 posted on 09/24/2001 9:27:27 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Abundy
"Sure, the adults are in charge now - but what happens after things calm down and the Media goes back to supporting a bunch of Socialists and the next thing you know Hillary and Schumer are President and VP? Do you really think they can be trusted with more power? I don't.

Ahhh! A breath of reason as last..........

185 posted on 09/24/2001 9:28:48 AM PDT by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Zviadist
Yeah, well I haven't been totally pacifist in my upset either, so some of my posts have been a little over the top. The point however seems to be the discussion of issues surounding the state of our country, the actions of our leaders, and the deeper reasoning to determine that the decisions being made are in our and our country's best interests. So much has happened and is happening. People are upset. The news is predominating on war and possible threats to our national security at home. People are upset and on edge. The issue of the stock market collapse seems distant and somewhat trivial compared to people's sense of survival, yet pieces that I read make me wonder about the interconnectedness of this whole shebang.

Are there other unidentified players in this drama?

186 posted on 09/24/2001 9:29:07 AM PDT by Osinski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Twodees
LOL
187 posted on 09/24/2001 9:29:25 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Excellent post! Lew Rockwell is genius! Pure genius! Unfortunately most Americans are too dumbed down to appreciate the historical analysis and would rather respond John Wayne style to any problems we face.

Fact: We got into WWI when German torpedo sunk Lusitania which was carrying munitions to Britain along with 1200 passengers. Germans took out ads in American newspapers warning us not to board this ship. Brits allowed these Americans to be sacrificed to get us in the war.

Result: More government control and one world League of Nations.

Fact: We got into WWII when we embargoed Japan's oil imports(act of war) and left our fleet as sitting ducks for the Japs to attack in Pearl Harbor. Common knowledge that FDR wanted us in the war and was willing to sacrifice these sailors for his Socialist New World order.

Result: the United Nations and half of the world turned over to commies in Europe and Asia.

My shallow thinking American friends need to rethink knee jerk reactions to government propaganda ie. Hugh Hewitt and his Neo Conservative cadre

188 posted on 09/24/2001 9:30:14 AM PDT by Buchanan4prez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rb22982
No, I do not. I equate the loonies on both extremes of the spectrum. The tin foil libertarians are as bad as the left wing socialist anti-Amrerican extremists. Both are going to hurt the government's cause in this war for their own agendas. The difference is is that I agree with much of the middle of the road libertarian policies and stances even though the party has become somewhat of a hollow shell.
189 posted on 09/24/2001 9:30:21 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Nuke'm Glowing
We are the apparent majority who disagree with you.

The same majority who support socialistic policies and abortion? No Thanks

190 posted on 09/24/2001 9:31:12 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Ada Coddington
I'll bump it. I've been pretty dismayed by some of the idiotic, knee-jerk responses I've read here to ANYTHING that smacks even remotely of criticism of the "nuke'em-all-and-let-God-sort-it-out" mentality. The "100% or nothing" crowd really needs to get a grip.

Note: By "100% or nothing" I'm referring to the attitude of those who take the position that, "you either agree with me totally or you're the enemy." With that kind of attitude, it's no wonder that the libs outflank us.

191 posted on 09/24/2001 9:32:14 AM PDT by jaime1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
Leaving aside conspiracy theories, I merely approach this from the view that it would have been better for the world to have both hostiles exhust themselves rather than one clear victor dictating terms.
192 posted on 09/24/2001 9:32:36 AM PDT by JAWs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: blackie
"We are at war and like the man said, you are either with US or with them. Which will it be?"

Define us. Define them.

193 posted on 09/24/2001 9:32:44 AM PDT by Osinski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Vigilant1
What do i say now? I say that the folks at LewRockwell.com have appeared to hit the nail squarely on the head.

Now, are you going to froth at the mouth and call me traitor or other such nonsense?

194 posted on 09/24/2001 9:34:16 AM PDT by jaime1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill
Well said, but don't forget the OIL.

Of course it was the oil.
But the play acting, pragmatism, or expediency, whatever we wish to call it has exacted a horrible price.

High enough(?) now to abandon it?

195 posted on 09/24/2001 9:35:12 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur, Ada Coddington
"Excellent contributors" like Demidog, who advocated the right to possess child pornography?

Just like sinkspur to falsely accuse someone of advocating child pornography. This is taking it way out of the realm of reasonable discourse. That post should be pulled.

Sinkspur is plainly a liar.

196 posted on 09/24/2001 9:37:55 AM PDT by Osinski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Nuke'm Glowing
That's why I'm a libertarian and not a Libertarian ;)

Considering joining the Constitutional Party at this point of the game though.

197 posted on 09/24/2001 9:39:21 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Scarlet Pimpernel
Agree or disagree, Sinkspur, their writings were always far more interesting than yours.

Interesting, yes.

In touch with reality? Hardly.

Unless, like Rivero, you thought JFK Jr.'s plane was brought down by a bomb under the wing.

Or, like Demidog, you advocate that America ought to be made safe for child pornographers.

198 posted on 09/24/2001 9:40:14 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
where did Demidog advocate legal possession of child pornography?
199 posted on 09/24/2001 9:40:24 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: metesky
If Congress and the Senate would actually declare war, I'd cut the gub'mint some slack.

Congress and the Senate?
Did the Senate Secede?

Seriously, this will never happen for the simple reason that if an official Declaration of War is made, a good chunk of our Congress would be prosecutable for Treason and Sedition.

While I would love to see that, they may be ignorant, but they're not stupid.
They would vote themselves into a corner?

200 posted on 09/24/2001 9:40:48 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 501-503 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson