Skip to comments.
WWGD? (What Would Gramsci Do?)
self
Posted on 09/16/2001 9:12:08 PM PDT by cicero's_son
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks for the ping. I am absorbing information as fast as I can and this article (and the responses) is fascinating.
To: cicero's_son
"All men are created equal" so put this idea to rest, get it?
62
posted on
09/17/2001 6:33:32 PM PDT
by
junta
To: junta
No, not really.
Care to enlighten me, Mr. Jefferson?
To: cicero's_son
You bet. This ol' dogma is certainly been put to use Mr. Madison.
64
posted on
09/17/2001 8:03:16 PM PDT
by
junta
To: junta
Are you drunk?
I'm serious.
To: cicero's_son
No you are not serious. Those words are the cornerstone of the Left's castle of lies and if you miss them and there signigicance that says much either for the Left's effectiveness or your own drunkenness.
66
posted on
09/17/2001 8:51:06 PM PDT
by
junta
To: junta
Perhaps I meant significance.
67
posted on
09/17/2001 8:56:50 PM PDT
by
junta
To: junta
Junta,
I don't know you, and I surely don't bear you any ill will. I believe you may have misunderstood me.
What I am proposing is an information war against Islam to go alongside our traditional war. Some of our historic enemies (Communists) mastered this form of warfare. I believe we can learn from their tactical expertise.
I am NOT proposing that we use Gramscian tactics to Gramsci's ends! Are you saying that this kind of warfare is inherently corrupt, inherently Leftist? If so, you may be right. I do not pretend to have all the answers.
To: mrustow
Much here to read!
To: knarf
we had exported porn...into their culture
as if these people have no perversions of their own...
To: cicero's_son
The other thing that troubles me about this approach is the possibility that Gramscianism is intrinsically corrupting. It has the feel of a dark art to me, and I wonder if anyone can really employ it without being contaminated.
Christianity, when allowed to flourish, is Gramscianism in form, yet healing not corrupting. It is the thing Islam fears the most. Islam depends on our Corruption of Christianity in our society to plant it's seed. The hook and bait that Islam uses is religious 'purity'. The secular society that has forced homosexuality, porn, drugs and capitalism as the forefront of our society has made the "Christian Nation" look like hypocrites. It matters not if the Christians do not live this lifestyle, they allow it. If Christian Morals were once again the foundation of our Nation, Islam would collapse of its own weight.
Islam is Religious Slavery, and is NOT fun to live with or in. However the freedom of Christ is a blast, freedom FROM sin, not freedom to SIN.
To: cicero's_son
I don't know that Gramsci would "handle" radical Islam. Gramscism is a strategy specifically designed to undermine liberal democracies, which grant a bunch of freedoms that radical Islam considers perversions: freedom of religion, opinion, the press, etc. It's not like Marxists are invisible, secret agents. They survive, and thrive, only in societies where slight deviations from the norm are permitted, and where they can recruit more initiates. Radical Islam offers no such liberties. Radical Islam's answer to Gramscians is, I think, to chop their heads off.
72
posted on
09/18/2001 9:17:19 AM PDT
by
mrustow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson