Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All About Rep. Lee the Appeaser
NewsMax | Sunday, Sept. 16, 2001 8:47 a.m. EDT | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 09/16/2001 7:21:57 AM PDT by truther

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: truther
Can we call this person what she is? TRAITOR!!!!!
21 posted on 09/16/2001 9:31:07 AM PDT by MissEdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mahone
"Funny, I thought she was supposed to represent people in her district, not her own personal agenda. Of course, I am old-fashioned."

Maybe she does. Scary, huh?

22 posted on 09/16/2001 9:32:21 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cal Riptide
Lee, should be dragged out of congress and slapped.

Or flushed, in a six gallon toilet!

23 posted on 09/16/2001 9:32:29 AM PDT by Not now, Not ever!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: truther
Reprehensible Barbara Lee (D-Ashcanistan), aka:

Barbarian Dishonorab-Lee

Barbara Jerk-Lee of Berkeley

Barbara Knee Jerk-Lee

Barbara "Commie-D of Terrors" Lee

Barbara "Leftist Horsesh*t Babsy" Lee

Barbara Lightweight Lee

Barbara "worse-than-Sheila" Jack@ss-Lee

Barbara deVille Lee

Barbara Boxcutter Lee

Barbary Pirates Lee

Barbara bin-with-Laden Lee

24 posted on 09/16/2001 9:33:55 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truther
Even Oakland City Council President Ignacio De La Fuente was disappointed in Lee. "I disagree with her," he said... " Our country has been attacked and thousands of innocent people are dead."

El Commandante Fuente, unlike Comrade Lee, understands the political ramifications of permitting ongoing massacre of blue-zoners. There are only so many Mexicans who can be brought in to replace them until Fox is governing a nation consisting of two frogs and a chicken. Lee, OTOH, probably believes there is no natural limit on how much one can stuff the ballot box to compensate.

25 posted on 09/16/2001 9:46:48 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truther
Has anyone given Ms. Lee her job description? It is to PROTECT the United States, if she didn't want to do it, she should never have applied for the job.
26 posted on 09/16/2001 9:54:01 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Lee represents the most radically anti-American constituency in the country. If she does anything even faintly patriotic, she will be ousted in the next election and replaced with the next available commie. The fact is that her constituents don't want her to uphold her oath. What they want is to turn America into a thoroughly socialist state.

In any election, she can only be challenged from the far left.

27 posted on 09/16/2001 10:38:40 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 537 Votes
A Democrat with a conscience,and a GOD no less! LOL
28 posted on 09/16/2001 12:29:10 PM PDT by NYCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: truther
I just posted an article on identification of the enemy this past Friday on FR. Ms. Lee has now proven herself to be an enemy. Read on.

In the aftermath of these most recent terrorist strikes, it is becoming increasingly important to identify the enemy. This is what President Bush was referring to when he indicated that we were facing a "different kind of enemy." The enemy is no longer a readily identifiable nation or set of leaders within a nation, but has spread like yeast in dough throughout the world. The enemy includes not only obvious groups of individuals, but various wrong ideas that are being exalted as ideals by "friend" and foe alike. Here's my cut at the enemies we face with regard to terrorism.

Enemies who are people:

1) Those that would engage in violence against our country and people, i.e. terrorists.
2) Those that would aid and abet those who would engage in violence against our country and people, i.e. foreign governments, wealthy idealists, family and friends of terrorists.
3) Those that would export weapons and other technologies that can be used to generate violence or support those who propagate violence against our country or people, i.e. businessmen.
4) Those that would make it easier through regulation or lack of enforcement to export weapons and other technologies that can be used to generate violence or support those who propagate violence against our country or people, i.e. business, government, security, and law enforcement agencies.
5) Those that would seek or promote diplomatic agreements for the sake of diplomacy without achieving true security for our people, i.e. various leaders or organizations both internal and external to our country including those in government, business, religion, media, etc.
6) Those that would seek or promote a judicial solution for the sake of political correctness without reasonable expectation of obtaining true justice or future security for our people, i.e. various leaders or organizations both internal and external to our country including those in government, business, religion, media, etc.
7) Those that would seek or promote peace at any cost, i.e. various leaders or organizations both internal and external to our country including those in government, business, religion, media, etc.
8) Those leaders who are not willing to accept the possibility for civilian or military casualties to exact justice on our enemies, i.e. various leaders or organizations both internal and external to our country including those in government, business, religion, media, etc.
9) Those leaders who are not willing to temporarily sacrifice some personal freedoms, rights, conveniences, or sacrifice individual people for the increased security of all, i.e. various leaders or organizations both internal and external to our country including those in government, business, religion, media, etc.

Ideological Enemies:

1) Radical Islam or any other faith or cause that promotes holy war or jihad against the US.
2) There is a judicial solution for every crime.
3) Tolerance is more important than truth.
4) All nations or people groups will play fair if given a chance.
5) All nations or people groups are capable of governing themselves.
6) The US must never occupy a country even though the indigenous people have demonstrated that they cannot govern those within their borders.
7) Innocent people must never be killed by the US military.
8) Nothing more than a measured response can be initiated against our enemies.
9) Preemptive strikes on our enemies are not appropriate.
10) The people have the right to know everything that we are doing militarily at any time.
11) The government cannot sacrifice any individuals or any individual rights for the security of the nation. (This is the scary one and hopefully only temporary)

The freedom we now enjoy hangs in the balance if we are not able to respond appropriately to these enemies. This grand experiment as an open society is going to be severely tested by these events and our response to them. God bless all of our leaders with the wisdom and discernment necessary to deal with the current crisis through thoughtful decisions. The ramifications of their decisions will be felt throughout the remainder of history.

29 posted on 09/16/2001 12:40:48 PM PDT by Rockitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson