Skip to comments.
America Approves Limits to Liberties
The Detroit News ^
| September 16, 2001
| Cameron McWhirter
Posted on 09/16/2001 3:59:40 AM PDT by riley1992
Edited on 05/25/2004 3:02:58 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Those limits to liberties are acceptable to Metro Detroiters and most other Americans. A Detroit News poll Thursday found that 88 percent of Metro Detroiters are willing to "accept restrictions on movements such as metal detectors and military personnel in public places" to increase the nation's security from terrorist attacks.
(Excerpt) Read more at detroitnews.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-235 next last
To: sc01 - imberedux
In fact, sc01, on that same subject, IMBE has just admitted on freepmail to being one of the old AFholes who know my real name.
Feel free to ask, if you don't mind associating with a FR hating slimeball.
201
posted on
09/16/2001 12:56:34 PM PDT
by
tpaine
Comment #202 Removed by Moderator
To: Illbay
Shut up, get in line,ROTFL. I am positively dismayed at why anyone would call you a jack-booted statist, Illbay.
To: Cultural Jihad
Islamic Jihad??
Cultural Jihad??
What's the difference? You both are totalitarian cretins clothing yourselves in religious clothe.
You keep up your STUPID remarks about Libertarians and I will keep finding plenty of ammo to shoot back.
Take care my fellow American(I guess you are an American),
CATO
204
posted on
09/16/2001 1:19:15 PM PDT
by
Cato
To: tpaine
sc01 gave a near-apology to you in #196, but you just had to post his private email message in #198, undoubtedly sent to you before he saw his mistake. Not very chivalrous of you, and apparently very petty.
To: riley1992
Let's see a declaration of war, first...then, we can look at some
temporary restrictions and practices that truly enhance our security.
Of course, as others have pointed out...the same people that want to put military personnel on street corners are the ones that don't want us to go around the world and destroy every vestige of jihadism.
If we're not fighting to preserve our freedom, for what are we fighting?
To: Admin Moderator - DemiDog - imberedux charges treason, is out of control once again
You should be banned again.
This would be your sixth, maybe eighth banning under different names?
Trying for the TCA/eschoir record?
207
posted on
09/16/2001 1:26:59 PM PDT
by
tpaine
Comment #208 Removed by Moderator
To: B Knotts
If we're not fighting to preserve our freedom, for what are we fighting? Common sense bump!
To: Cultural Jihad
"sc01 gave a near-apology to you in #196, but you just had to post his private email message in #198, undoubtedly sent to you before he saw his mistake."
And as usual, petty & idiotic response from you.
I didn't see his near-apology till AFTER posting his nastygram.
I've told you clowns before. I will NOT keep unsolicited filth Emailed to me 'private'.
The best way to expose your twisted hate is to publish it.
210
posted on
09/16/2001 1:40:40 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: Cultural Jihad, Illbay, Kevin Curry, All Who Would Would Trade Freedom For Safety
I am weary of attempting to spark rational thought in you. I have no thought provoking or even harsh words left for you. You yourselves, and generations to come will find all the appropriate words to curse you for the unintended consequences of the genie you are so quick to let out of the bottle to "protect" your precious selves.
In the meantime, I will trade no "safety" - whether real or illusion - for your or anyone else's foot on my neck. I can only caution you to exercise great care if you attempt to force such a devil's bargain on me.
To: imberedux
NO one is blinded to your hate of FR, and those who call you on it.
Under different names, you [& your fellow jihadists] have been attacking us for three years, --- using ANY means; --- you have, since 9/11 used one of the lowest, your false patriotism.
212
posted on
09/16/2001 1:52:40 PM PDT
by
tpaine
Comment #213 Removed by Moderator
To: All
I just did something that I have never done here before. I asked to have this thread yanked. God forbid we have to stand shoulder to shoulder one day soon. We will go down if this is how we behave.
To: riley1992
I asked to have this thread yanked.Why?
To: riley1992
I would really hate to see all of the other great points on this thread erased.
To: He Rides A White Horse
You really think anyone is going to see them through all of that garbage? Not likely.
To: Mulder
The proper response is the eradication of the enemy and the maintenance of all of our rights. The two are not mutually exclusive.What happens if we don't is being dramatically shown by imberedux and tpaine.
To: riley1992
I managed to catch a couple of them. By the way, I enjoy all of your posts. Thanks for posting this one.
To: Right Face
I managed to catch a couple of them.Then I congratulate you. This is rather like a traffic accident. You get stuck staring at all the ugliness.
Thanks for posting this one.
You're welcome. If they yank it I will try it again and see if the asinine insults can be kept to a minimum.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-235 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson