[JasonC]

I would like those to who think so to explain how Nigeria, Morocco, Malaysia, Turkey, and Kazakstan (and the like) are somehow against us in this matter. Certainly Sudan, Afghanistan and Iraq are. Iran, Syria, Libya and the PA would probably prefer to duck at this time, but will continue to support terrorists if we don't stop them. Jordan, the Saudis, the rest of the gulf states, Egypt and Pakistan will support us, but with some domestic opposition and misgivings.

I see 3 countries on the hot seat and 4 hiding from our immediate anger, with about 1/12th of the total Islamic population in each of those categories. Not counting internal opposition - two of the hotseat cases have ongoing civil wars.

I am asking for something beyond generalizations and mere opinions. Name specific countries, and what you think their position supposedly is. You won't convince me of anything practical without specifics.

[Billy_bob_bob]

Jason - thanks again for your input. One question - I understand that "Islam" is a complex and fragmented entity, as you have so eloquently described in your various postings. However, it is my opinion that as our war against "terrorism" progresses, it is going to eventually end up becoming a war against Islam.

The reasoning is simple; the more we attack, and the more successful our attacks are, the more polarized the "moderate" Moslems become, the more likely they are to become radicalized, and the radical Islam factions will become more powerful. Eventually all of the moderate regimes will be toppled, and all of the Islamic nations of the world will be radicalized and united in their violent opposition to the West.

I've simplified my arguments, but I trust you get my point. My question to you is; am I correct in my assumptions? Or, am I totally off base? I look forward to your reply.