Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gary_f
I'm not sure I believe this. If he had them, why wouldn't he have used them?

There was no accompanying demand with this attack. The attack itself was the point, and it was meant to inflict maximum damage to the country.

I think he may have given it his best shot.

5 posted on 09/14/2001 1:53:45 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
If he had them, why wouldn't he have used them?

The idea (I suppose) would be to strike a massive blow, then make the bombs' presence known to key US officials. That leaves the US to decide between attacking a risking tens of millions of lives or doing nothing and being seen as weak and humiliated.

All that said, I don't believe Bin Laden has working nuclear weapons - he may have components. And regardless, we must strike now or live in fear forever.

9 posted on 09/14/2001 2:05:21 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
I think he may have given it his best shot.

I'm not convinced of that. All the more reason to be vigilant.

10 posted on 09/14/2001 2:06:05 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
I think he may have given it his best shot.

If so, then he's dumber than he is evil. Either that, or he exponentially underestimated American resolve.

I suspect he's got alot more tricks up his sleeve -- maybe not nuclear, but tricks nonetheless.

And another thing I suspect you can be pretty sure of: He's not in Afghanistan.

11 posted on 09/14/2001 2:20:23 PM PDT by Dominus Vobiscum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson