Just like the others who, perceived what I said to mean that we should give up our liberties for safety. I never said that or met that, but my poorly written statement made people believe that was the way I was thinking. And for that I apologized.
What I was angry at, was the fact that the conspiracy theorist on this forum, were more worried about Uncle Sam coming in the black helicopters to take away more of their rights, than they were for the victims of the tragic incident.
Figures that you'd react emotionally rather than thinking/reason. I've seen you do that repeatedly on 2 out of 3 threads I've read you on -- this makes four. These people are not conspiracy nuts, they have honest concerns about many of the issues surrounding these terrorist crimes. Their own freedom is one such concern. I have pointed out to you a couple of times that I'm on to your intentional straw-man like minimizing which is a much used federal LEO tactic. Usually to flaunt an air of authority and often superiority. You are beyond arrogance in the means by which you belittle people. You claim you're an INS agent or border guard or some federal immigration agent -- obviously you took it on the chin Tuesday, September 11, 2001.
You wrote in post #16 in response to the author of the article/post: Thousands of peolple have just died, becuase you wanted a little liberty.
The above article/post was in no way a conspiracy type post. It was a person concerned for their freedom. Your backpedaling is that of a little man. A pipsqueak. Albeit, a pip with JBT power.
Thousands of people have died in many wars for liberty. I would think it would be apparent that is what I meant. You did perceive it wrong indeed. No problem.