Your AI has a somewhat twisted definition of “conservative” if it claims that Mike Rogers is one. He perhaps WAS one, years ago.
Rogers is infinitely better than the radical Mussie “doctor” and infinitely better than the equally radical congresswoman who carries the “establishment Democrat” designation. She’s still totally liberal.
Rogers faked to the right occasionally as a congressman (fearing a primary challenge) and he was OK most of the time. But in his final term, during which he announced quite early that he was not running again, he ran shrieking to the left. Not having to face the voters again emboldened him to show his true colors.
Still, he’s about as good as we can do in Michigan — a real conservative candidate (if one even exists in that state) can’t win there statewide. But then neither can anyone else with an (R) these days, though sometimes it requires an unusually heavy dose of Democrat Vote Fraud to keep their winning streak alive.
Rogers has a hell of a lot better chance of winning in 2026 than either of the Two Stooges (John James, Perry Johnson) who are running hapless campaigns for Governor. How many 3-time statewide losers are active today and running for something (Adam Laxalt and Danny Tarkanian in Nevada come to mind)?
James has a good chance to reach that level this year.
In 2023 he sadly said his personal views on marriage had “evolved”. However, his legislative record and current 2026 U.S. Senate campaign align heavily with traditional conservative opposition to expanded LGBTQ+.
He never went back on don’t ask don’t tell, and the PAC could be spending millions on the best of the aforementioned 3 candidates when it comes to supporting traditional American values (on these issues and on economic issues as well) but aren’t.