Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/21/2025 11:39:38 AM PDT by karpov
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
When I want medical advice from a grifters financial rag
Oh, nevermind, I never will.
They just want to sell big pharma .
Snake oil salesmen .
First of all the mRNA “vaccine” is not a vaccine. The CDC changed the definition of vaccine so it include the nRNA shot.
Second, why doesn’t the WSJ stay in their lane of calling for regime changes and endless wars.
Let me see. Who am I gonna believe? An industry that has billions of dollars to make on mRNA vaccines or someone making nothing trying to protect the public?
Do you mean the fact that the "vaccine" (the CDC changed the definition of "vaccine" twice because it isn't a vaccine) didn't actually protect you at all and made it more likely you would contract COVID-1984?
That "oversold?"
Do these people and all people who follow this believe that the body has no way of fighting disease?
Do they know that this country is freaking fat? The whole country? That kids can’t get up to go outside and their mothers feed them American crap?
The WSJ is an evil paper.
When the advertisement revenue sides with Big Pharma, what would you expect the media prostitutes to say?
Translation:
They are not done harming and killing us for profit and population control with this highly effective weapon.
~Easy
I have a simple question for these WSJ “experts”: What is the short, medium, and long-term safety testing results for mRNA “vaccines”? Have any of them passed muster on the safety side?
From what I have been able to gather, none have.
I’m still waiting for “them” to loosen up access on Ivermectin, so I can get it for less than $1 per pill.....
Force the editorial board to get jabbed quarterly and see what they say.
Is this an example of Covid Apologists?
The whole article is full of holes leaking crap.
I would think the bigger concern would be to follow normal, established testing processes for all “vaccines.” I would also revert to the old definition of vaccines: They prevent infection and spreading of specific disease.
It’s not that hard.
A Japanese researcher showed that there was 5x the excess deaths from the vaccine compared to the unvaccinated, and the toxicity increases with each dose.
18 million Japanese in the statistics.
Sounds like the WSJ editorial staff needs 5-8 more jabs to clear their head.
I REALLY wish ALL media Co’s were required to release an actual $ number and a % of revenue stating where their $$ comes from.
Esp “news” shows. It would be great if they were required to have a crawl on the bottom of the screen, Pfizer $30m/ 10%, NEA Teachers’ Union %10m / 10% etc, DNC Party $20m/ 15%..
“ decades-old inactivated whole-virus vaccines”
These work.
mRNA vaccines are little more than placebos.
Seconded.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.