Posted on 08/09/2025 11:30:19 PM PDT by nickcarraway
It’s feral black teenagers.
You happy now?
Ll
“the 4-year-old girl who was tragically shot dead by a crazed gunman outside of Target moments after she watched her grandfather murdered”
WHITE MAN DID IT
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4334269/posts
“’abhorrent’ and ‘horrific’ child sex abuse ring out of an underground bunker near their homes in Brent, Alabama”
WHITE MEN
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4330275/posts
We aren’t talking about that shooting. We are talking about the feral black savage who thought popping off rounds in Times Square was a good idea.
And for every one of the white mentally ill killers there’s a dozen or more perpetrated by feral black teenagers.
So take your phony outrage, fold it till it’s all sharp edges, and sit on it.
L
“A suspect in the deaths of four people whose bodies were found in northwest Tennessee was identified by authorities Thursday.”
WHITE GUY
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4331944/posts
But you think melanin causes violent behavior.
This is a scientific claim without the science.
You’ve joined the ranks of those who think firearms commit shootings and SUVs cause accidents.
Why would your mind tell you to do this?
Do you know what kinds of crimes top level bankers, business executives and politicians commit against children?
Rape, torture, murder and cannibalism. And they force children to do the same things to other children.
These criminals are white.
Why do you not know this? Define moron.
“But you think melanin causes violent behavior.”
Wrong, Skippy. I never said any such thing. You have no idea what I think.
I’m saying is that, for whatever reason, the vast majority of violent crimes in the country are committed by feral young black men.
It’s not the melanin content that causes it. It’s the fact that “black culture” today is toxic and turns out these monsters in astonishing numbers. And part of the problem is that stupid, weak white people like you refuse to acknowledge the facts.
Instead you take the cheap cowardly way out and slam down the race card.
So once again, you can take your phony liberal outrage, fold it until it’s all sharp edges, and sit on it. While your at it make onefor Al Sharpton. You sound an awful lot like he does.
L
No, you haven’t paid attention.
I’ve said many times, black criminals should be prosecuted and put into prison. This is what you call problem solving.
Another kind of problem solving is teaching communists like you how to think.
To expand your thinking even more, start taking a look at what caused the destruction of the black culture.
But come to think of it, I would guess you’ve seen my posts on this.
Again, problem solving is what made America great. To solve the problem of the cabal ruining black culture and everything else about our country, we get rid of the cabal.
Why are you afraid to speak against the cabal? Are you weak in both mind and character?
Again.
The problem is the cabal.
Now post about it.
“ I’ve said many times, black criminals should be prosecuted and put into prison. This is what you call problem solving.”
Incorrect.
That’s what is called treating the symptoms instead of the disease.
So nice try, Scooter.
L
But why would you want black criminals to get away with their crimes?
Keep your communism out of our country!
We absolutely differ on that assessment. I will stand by mine. Of course, you may stand by yours too.
What do to (or not to do) differs substantially between the two assessments. It makes a big difference which one is correct.
The "Progressive" or "Liberal" narrative on race relations has been tried for well over 60 years now. I believe that we can call it a very definite failure. That is because the Civil Rights movement was corrupted early on to serve quite different purposes than what was presented as a truly noble cause. The cause was noble and is still valid (IMO). We are seeing the results of corrupting that cause today.
It is way past time to move on to much harsher and less comfortable narratives that more closely match observations.
I see your point on the influence of culture as important and somewhat valid. Culture amplifies or suppresses tendencies in a population. To that point, certain elements commonly considered as "Black culture" should be ruthlessly suppressed in Black and White populations.
The genetic limitations of Black populations (as I discern them) are a much more difficult problem to handle. There is an upper ten percent of Black populations which have intelligence and aggression levels substantially the same as White populations. They can and do fit in to a high-trust civilization. Perhaps they can be encouraged to expand and displace their less intelligent and more violent co-ethnics. Or at least control them.
Maybe I am wrong in these assessments. It is possible that I could change opinions. All it would take is evidence. I don't see much evidence to change them.
Yes, this is nasty stuff. Solutions, if there are solutions, are complicated and unpleasant. We have deviated way too far from the original intentions of the Civil Rights movements of the 1960's. It is a major tragedy that the movement has been so corrupted into the opposite of what it was supposed to be.
“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”
(Dr Martin Luther King)
“The genetic limitations of Black populations (as I discern them) are a much more difficult problem to handle.”
Egad, you are quite the wily one.
And thank you for bringing us, with your quote above, to the most essential point of this conversation.
Genetic causation is established through discernment, but not only through discernment. Only the anti-science sector (the progressives) would say that it is.
Discernment is only the beginning. It is what leads us to scientific discovery. Unfortunately for your assessment, there is no scientific observation establishing a causal link between (the gene for) melanin and violent behavior.
I can see you won’t need me to repeat anything, but for the record’s sake I will:
There is no science establishing melanin as a cause of violent behavior.
“Unfortunately for your assessment, there is no scientific observation establishing a causal link between (the gene for) melanin and violent behavior.”
Not for melanin but there is a strong correlation with intelligence, or lack thereof.
Murray’s The Bell Curve is illustrative on this.
L
“there is no scientific observation establishing a causal link between (the gene for) melanin and violent behavior”
“Not for melanin but there is a strong correlation with intelligence, or lack thereof.“
We’re talking about morality, not the (flawed) system of measuring intelligence.
There is no correlation of any kind between IQ scores and moral behavior.
Can you understand this concept?
“ There is no correlation of any kind between IQ scores and moral behavior.”
But there is between IQ scores and societal development.
It’s why Western Europe and Japan are far more advanced than Equatorial Guinea or Haiti for example.
L
“ There is no correlation of any kind between IQ scores and moral behavior.”
“But there is between IQ scores and societal development.”
“It’s why Western Europe and Japan are far more advanced than Equatorial Guinea or Haiti for example.”
Did the average IQ of Japanese somehow increase after WWII? No. So their (very recent) advancement couldn’t have anything to do with IQ. In fact, neither does the societal development of the West.
The West advanced primarily due to moral behavior, which comes from acceptance of the objective moral code.
“So their (very recent) advancement couldn’t have anything to do with IQ.”
What is your evidence that the advance is recent?
L
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.