Posted on 07/27/2025 12:39:21 PM PDT by Eleutheria5
Yo! King! Boobalah. Tell the farmers to eat cake.
Parliament has held no-confidence votes literally for centuries. UIM, I was discussing the monarch’s reserve powers.
Well, of course they’re revolting, old boy. Their hands are always dirty and they have these horrid dialects that are barely intelligible. It’s time Lord Starmer put them in their place. And raised money for Ukraine, of course.
I posted the FACTS, even though I knew that you uneducated lot wouldn't believe me. You just LOVE to post utter tripe about topics you neither know about nor understand at all.
How long have YOU studied the history and laws of the UK?
How many Brit newspapers do you read every day/at least once a week?
How many times have you been to the UK?
How many Brits do you personally know, who live there now?
Have you EVER had to submit a legal paper of any kind, to the UK Parliament to be passed ?
I doubt that you can TRUTHFULLY answer "yes"/supply the details to any ( forget ALL ) of those queries!
So just go look up what I've posted re VOTE OF NO CONFINDENCE!
Arrest your food growing taxpayers
“ YOU’S?
If you are attempting the Brooklynese…”
—
Um, you wrote I’s in 29:
“ I’s explain…”
I was following your lead.
MESSAGE TO HIS MAJESTY:
No UK Monarch has ANY real power in 2025, over the government, let alone over the elected P.M.!
Tell me how the Elector of Hanover got the throne?
But obviously you will attempted to use ANYTHING in order to try to make it appear that you're correct and that I'm not. You still lose!
Wow.
I kept it silent and just watched the captions at 2x speed.
Now it’s more proof by assertion plus red herrings. Using logical fallacies is not proof, is all I’m saying; liberals use that in lieu of arguments.
I told you to go look up Ex-P.M. Theresa May for the proof and/or a VOTE OF NO CONFINDENCE. Yet you refuse to do so.
As someone who can't do a link ( don't try to explain it, many have done that and I still can't ),you need to go look up BOTH on your own and then apologize!
Does this mean they can behead them but they can’t fire them? Where are they on drawing and quartering?
Sounds soooooo fake...
That goes back to the Holy Roman Empire, not the British parliament.
The forum turns bare URLs into links.
And since I wasn’t talking about Theresa May but the monarch’s reserve powers, I don’t know what your insertion into my responses even mean, sorry.
“”Things are really bad in the U.K. when people are getting arrested “ higgledy piggledy”.””
The higgledy part would be bad enough... but when you add in the piggledy, on top of it.. it’s horrifically heinous and inhumane. I’m sure the UN will be stepping in any moment now to save those poor people from the unspeakable human rights violations now happening in the UK.
Nice little tinge of hysteria in that headline.
No, today's UK Monarchs really have no real powers at all; they are just sort of like "ambassadors", but they DO head many charities, and give special "warrants" to companies whose products that they like ; they also can and DO remove said warants. King Charles just removed the warrant from Cadbury's chocolates, because they've changed and aren't as good as they once were. And having been a big fan of that brand for many decades, I agree with King Charles; Cadbury's just don't make very good chocolates any more. :-(
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.