Posted on 07/25/2025 5:17:16 PM PDT by henbane
If and a big if, anything gets pursued, my guess is that all of these names are already in the files, but with nothing to actually tie them to actual wrongdoing. But if Maxwell accuses several of acts and then provides a deposition, then they enter discovery which could lead to indictments. But I’m not a lawyer, so not exactly sure what or if, anything happens next.
“Dersh was Epstein’s lawyer in 2006”
Maybe attorney-client privilege gets weakened after death.
If Trumps not one it is
“””Dersh was Epstein a lawyer in 2006”””
He was the lawyer for O.J. Simpson, Mike Tyson, Patty Hearst, Leona Helmsley, Julian Assange, too. I guess that makes him a pedo file.
and what does that mean? I have a 100 period in my “orbit” and after maybe the first 6 they are meaningless.
Nope.
If one of Epstein’s younger females ‘entertained’ someone other than Epstein and Maxwell, the young female would probably know and could have a lawyer call Bondi or Letitia James’ office.
If you want justice, sometimes you have to ask a lawyer for help.
Lawyer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdSKlwBAkGM&ab
I dont care what the headline says
So first question I will be looking for..did they ask about Leon Black. Leon Black gave US virgin islands 62 million dollars without admitting guilt
Treasury Dept not cooperating with Senate Finance Committee on Leon Black
It is more than 100. 107 might have been better.
“””But if Maxwell accuses several of acts and then provides a deposition, then they enter discovery which could lead to indictments””””””
Testimony from a jailhouse snitch trying to get out early probably doesn’t have much credibility.
“Which means what??”
You tell me.
[what do the body cams say?]
It means Derschowitz was on the island. Is that a crime?
“Another exception under Rule 1.6 states that an attorney may – but need not – reveal confidential information “when permitted or required under these Rules or to comply with other law or court order.” This might include a subpoena compelling an attorney to disclose client information as is the case here.”
“the attorney must “assert reasonable and non-frivolous objections to the subpoena and provide only the information not subject to such objections.” Following this committee’s guidance, you must assert the objections and disclose responsive records not subject to those objections.”
“Mayorga v. Tate illustrates that an administrator or executor can waive privilege, in which case an attorney can be compelled to testify”
That’s off the web. I’m not a lawyer.
It means she gave names of people who were in Epstein’s orbit in some fashion.
You are wrong. She also gave guidance to the underage victims on what Epstein and his associates wanted sexually. She knows the names. What the media never explores is "FOLLOW THE MONEY." A forensic analysis of the source of his money will explain everything.
He currently is NOT trump’s lawyer. He’s DOJ attorney.
Epstein was transparently a walking crime scene.
For everyone that keeps yammering about there being no evidence (there is), or Maxwell is not reliable (she isn’t), or all the evidence is tainted (no, it isn’t) you need to understand for starters FINCEN
Payments can be traced. Bank of America said
““no apparent economic, business or lawful purpose.”
A report by Robert Mazur, former U.S. Federal Agent and author of “The Infiltrator”
https://kyc360.com/knowledge-hub/resources/fincen-files-confirm-the-elephant-in-the-room
The banks that paid out many millions might have interesting documents supplied by the lawyers of Epstein’s younger females.
Bondi might have someone talk to the bank legal departments.
exactly. Hope she has the goods to back up her claims-
“”””Epstein was transparently a walking crime scene.””
Could be. But that’s not evidence that others committed crimes without real evidence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.