Posted on 07/16/2025 5:20:10 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
I now we know WHY the Dems are ALL jumping on the bandwagon, the Dems are absolute professionals at projection!!!
p
Was she in the Federal Prosecutors office in 2007?
Epstein had cia tell the palm bch.prosecutors that he was an intel asset and they had to go easy on him. The prosecutor tried everything he could to come down on him but higher ups stopped any meaningful prosecution every time.
He was indeed a cia asset but likely had deals with who knows how many other intel agencies for many countries.
“…Ghislaine Maxwell if she is allowed to testify to Congress (as she has requested).”
She had her chance in court. She didn’t.
She’ll never testify in front of Congress.
As far as “higher ups” capable of instructing the US Attorney Acosta to go easy on a suspect, there are two. The Attorney General , in this case Roberto Gonzales, would have been one, the other being the President, in this case Bush.
There you have it. I can’t imagine an Attorney General going easy on pedo without first clearing it with his boss. So Bush is involved in this saga.
and we know never to trust Bush.
The Richardson connection rings true for all kinds of reasons. Remember that he went from UN to Secretary of Energy. Monica was sent to him in NY to get her out of the White House. Richardson spent his time at Energy trying to buy Feinstein’s support for his Vice Presidency [of the United States]. NM governorship was what he got out of all of it. He was a corrupt sleaze for sure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.