Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US only has 25% of all Patriot missile interceptors needed for Pentagon’s military plans
The Guardian ^ | July 8th, 2025 | Unattributed

Posted on 07/08/2025 6:38:47 PM PDT by Mariner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
For those who think we have plenty, or even "enough", take your anti-American BS elsewhere.

Ukraine with now get a token 10 interceptors of 30 previously approved by Biden.

The commies at New Republic blame it on Trump's support of Israel...then later acknowledge stocks have been low ever since Biden starting shipping them to Ukraine in 2022. Early in the war Ukraine was burning through them like they were free and inexhaustible. Some used to shoot down $50,000 drones.

Only 550 are produced annually and those are sorely needed in the Pacific theater where we have actual interests.

1 posted on 07/08/2025 6:38:47 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mariner

And for those who do not know, the Trump Administration and Congress have not approved a single dime of new funding for Ukraine.


2 posted on 07/08/2025 6:41:22 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I’ve only budgeted 25% of what my wife wants to spend on the grandchildren


3 posted on 07/08/2025 6:45:17 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Good!


4 posted on 07/08/2025 6:56:16 PM PDT by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: laplata

You believe it’s good that we have but 25% of required stocks?


5 posted on 07/08/2025 6:57:20 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“the stockpiles of a number of critical munitions have been below that floor for several years since the Biden administration started sending military aid to Ukraine.”

We are $31 trillion in debt, and our weapon stockpiles are low. We should not be sending a nickel in cash or nickel’s worth of armaments to any other country. We have given away enough American taxpayer money on foreign welfare/military adventurism. Let’s take care of ourselves first for a change.


6 posted on 07/08/2025 7:06:19 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (“Giving money & power to government is like giving whiskey & car keys to teenage boys” P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

If you’d get off your high horse for a minute you might notice that he replied to post #2.


7 posted on 07/08/2025 7:06:49 PM PDT by TigersEye (The Golden Age of MAGA is upon us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The U.S. can make more Patriot missile batteries — but doing so is not quick or easy, for several key reasons:


🛠️ 1. Complexity of the System

Patriot missile systems are extremely sophisticated, involving:

Radar systems

Command and control units

Multiple launchers

Interceptor missiles (PAC-2, PAC-3, GEM-T)

Each component takes time to engineer, test, and integrate. It’s not just about building more missiles — you need the whole ecosystem.


🏭 2. Limited Production Capacity

Only a few companies (like Raytheon for the U.S.) build Patriots, and they can only produce a finite number at a time:

Raytheon says it can currently produce about 12–16 batteries per year, depending on funding and priorities.

PAC-3 missiles are made by Lockheed Martin, and production is ramping up — but not instantaneously.

Expanding production means building new factories, hiring skilled workers, and dealing with supply chain constraints.


⛓️ 3. Supply Chain Bottlenecks

Key parts of a Patriot system involve:

Specialized semiconductors

High-performance radar components

Rocket propulsion systems These rely on a global supply chain that has faced disruptions since COVID-19 and the war in Ukraine. Some components have long lead times (12–36 months).


💰 4. High Cost

Each battery costs $1–1.5 billion, and each interceptor missile costs $4–5 million. Increasing production requires large up-front investments and Congressional approval for defense budgets.


👥 5. Training and Deployment

Even if you build the hardware:

You need to train soldiers to operate and maintain it.

A Patriot unit requires 90+ personnel and months of training.

Deployment logistics are complex, especially in overseas or forward bases.


🌍 6. Competing Global Demand

Countries like Ukraine, Poland, Taiwan, Germany, Japan, and Saudi Arabia are buying or requesting Patriots. The U.S. must decide whether to prioritize allies or its own stockpile.


🇺🇸 So Why Not Just Massively Expand?

The U.S. is increasing production — but even with urgency, you can’t go from “need more” to “have more” in weeks. It’s a multi-year ramp-up due to complexity, cost, and industrial limitations.

From AI.


8 posted on 07/08/2025 7:09:44 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
The Biden Administration blew through an amazing number of missiles - far more than was prudent and down to critical shortage levels

Milley should be courtmartialed for what he did to this country

9 posted on 07/08/2025 7:09:52 PM PDT by rdcbn1 (TV )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Well, hell, let’s run out and tell the world.


10 posted on 07/08/2025 7:11:26 PM PDT by grobdriver (The CDC can KMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
Well, hell, let’s run out and tell the world.

Putin's strategy makes sense. Attrition warfare.

Deplete the military resources from the West.

Ukraine will be forced to surrender.

At this point, the EU will have to step up, especially Germany.

11 posted on 07/08/2025 7:13:42 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“Lauch all you want - we’ll make more.”

My name is Jay Leno and I approve this message.

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FFnfaqIbagAAMpAM.png%3Alarge&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=6b99f253369e51bb81ea058cd652056a5f9cf77e3860dc818f3c17ee811c492c


12 posted on 07/08/2025 7:16:28 PM PDT by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

New?

How much OLD is left?


13 posted on 07/08/2025 7:17:17 PM PDT by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

“At this point, the EU will have to step up, especially Germany.”

NOBODY in the EU has anything remotely close the Patriot.

Ukraine is going to have to learn to do without.


14 posted on 07/08/2025 7:17:35 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Order more. Make more. Whatever. We just added a hundred billion to the budget of a trillion dollars a year.


15 posted on 07/08/2025 7:22:06 PM PDT by napscoordinator (DeSantis is a beast! Florida is the freest state in the country! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“US only has 25% of all Patriot missile interceptors needed for Pentagon’s military plans”

So I guess we can give these remaining 25% to Ukraine and have them be able to (somewhat) hold off Russian attacks for another 3 or 4 months, considering the intensity of the attacks at this point.

Hard to see how this is in our interest, or even in how it’s in Ukraine’s interest.


16 posted on 07/08/2025 7:22:17 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

 
 

The first B-29 flew in September 1942, and by January 1944, the 100th aircraft had been accepted into service.

Production of the B-29 rapidly increased throughout the year, with the 500th aircraft being accepted in July and the 1,000th in November.

By March 1945, the 2,000th B-29 was accepted, and by June, the 3,000th.

The peak production rate was reached in April with 300 aircraft per month, which further increased to 375 aircraft in the last full month of production.  12.5 per day

 

 

17 posted on 07/08/2025 7:23:51 PM PDT by Elsie ( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

“Order more. Make more. Whatever.”

That includes not giving away what we have until production catches up.

We’re at 550 per year now. It’s estimated we’ll be at 650 per year by the end of 2027.


18 posted on 07/08/2025 7:28:32 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

So?

Go get some more, pronto!


19 posted on 07/08/2025 7:31:19 PM PDT by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

“The peak production rate was reached in April with 300 aircraft per month, which further increased to 375 aircraft in the last full month of production. 12.5 per day”

Incredible! How many of the parts and key minerals came from China?


20 posted on 07/08/2025 7:33:32 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson