Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radical Social Policies on Full Display at UN Human Rights Council
Center for Family and Human Rights ^ | July 4, 2025 | Iulia-Elena Cazan

Posted on 07/08/2025 5:57:06 AM PDT by Morgana

NEW YORK, July 4 (C-Fam) UN human rights officials took over the 59th session of the UN Human Rights Council to promote divisive social policies, including advocating for “gender-affirming care” services for migrants and criticizing countries that do not support pride marches, LGBT-friendly curricula in schools, and the killing of the unborn.

Held from June 28 to July 9th in Geneva, Switzerland, this year’s UN Human Rights Council session convened member states, UN agencies, and accredited civil society organizations to engage with UN special rapporteurs’ latest reports.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk opened the session by decrying “populist” movements and their pushback against DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion] policies.

“Populists and authoritarians are working hard with their so-called culture wars to distract people from today’s very real problems […] Some call these DEI policies. I call them standing up for equality,” Türk said.

A glossary on DEI usage within the UN system reveals that the UN understands DEI to encompass a commitment to controversial gender ideology ideas, including promoting a vision of gender disconnected from biological reality, identity politics, and “sexual rights.” These ideas are highly controversial among member states and were never agreed to by consensus at the UN.

Under the Trump administration, the US rejected DEI and gender ideology terminology and policies at the UN, referring to them as “radical” and “immoral.” Argentina’s Javier Milei and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdoğan expressed similar concerns at international fora.

Despite the polarizing nature of DEI and gender ideology, Türk proceeded to criticize Georgia, Hungary, Slovakia, and Turkey for their stance against “LGBTIQ+ advocacy” and LGBTQ-friendly curricula in schools and their refusal to host Pride marches. Last week, the Special Procedures segment of the UN Human Rights Council released a media statement expressing “grave concern” at Hungary’s decision not to host a pride march in 2025.

The Independent Expert on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity presented a report on forced displacement to the Human Rights Council, claiming that countries need to provide gender-affirming care to migrants.

Tlaleng Mofokeng, UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health, took it to the Council to advocate for a “paradigm shift to reimagine health systems,” asking for “full decriminalization of abortion and ensuring that there is no barrier both from patient access and a careworker provision side.”

In her report, Mofokeng asked that medical education be updated “through a human rights, community-based approach that embodies ethical practices and empowers both providers and patients.” Mofokeng spoke against doctors’ conscientious objections to abortion, framing them as a potential violation of the sexual and reproductive rights of women.

Ms. Haina Lu, a Member of the Working Group on Discrimination Against Women and Girls, criticized countries that enact pro-natalist and family-oriented policies and said that “Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) “is clear that human rights are granted to born people.”

Despite the repeated pro-abortion rhetoric at the UN, its member states never agreed to an international right to abortion, many of them holding that the right to life beginning at conception is consistent with the text of the UDHR, which claims in Article 3 that “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.”

Argentina pushed back against Lu’s comment on abortion, saying that “two lives are at stake,” that babies in the womb “have no voice,” and that “it is up to decision-makers and leaders to defend equal dignity and their rights.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndpeter2vvs6thru9; abortion; genesischapter19; godless; homosexualagenda; lgbt; lgbtq; prolife; romans1; sodomandgomorrah; un

1 posted on 07/08/2025 5:57:06 AM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

BTTT


2 posted on 07/08/2025 6:07:39 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
[Türk proceeded to criticize Georgia, Hungary, Slovakia, and Turkey for their stance against “LGBTIQ+ advocacy” and LGBTQ-friendly curricula in schools]

Typical of the Godless, Globalist, Reprobate United Nations


Will that be:

Fiery Earthquake?
Or Fiery Asteroid?

Welcome to the Days of Lot as prophesied in Luke 17:28-32
- the WORLD is not paying attention




Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.









LURKERS, PLEASE TELL
EVERYONE YOU KNOW -
SHARE THE IMAGES & TEXT
via EMAIL / TEXT MESSAGES
- before The Church Age Ends!

3 posted on 07/08/2025 6:11:51 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in thays of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

UN accountable bureaucrats are EVIL. They are not of the people, by the people and for the people.

F UN


4 posted on 07/08/2025 6:16:17 AM PDT by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
[Argentina pushed back against Lu’s comment on abortion, saying that “two lives are at stake,” that babies in the womb “have no voice,” and that “it is up to decision-makers and leaders to defend equal dignity and their rights.”]

THANK YOU ARGENTNA!

Democrat Manchurian Candidate
Barack Hussein Obama
is a notorious baby-killer, too.

Alan Keyes JUSTLY and RIGHTFULLY said
"Barack Obama supports INFANTICIDE"


Democrat Manchurian Candidate Barack Hussein Obama certainly DOES like baby-killers - it's in his Satanic DNA

AND if a baby SURVIVED an ABORTION ATTEMPT Democrat Manchurian Candidate Barack Hussein Obama MADE SURE their lives were NOT saved by going AGAINST the Illinois Born-Alive Infant Protection Act (BAIPA). Jill Stanek, nurse, told us ALL about it.

What many Americans voted for in November, 2008:


5 posted on 07/08/2025 6:23:34 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in thays of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Democrat Kamala Harris was willing to have a few million babies killed
so that she could have POLITICAL POWER and MONEY





6 posted on 07/08/2025 6:26:58 AM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in thays of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

the U.S. should stay in the UN just so they can veto anti-west nutter resolutions at the security council, but make only token payments like the vast majority of member “nations” do ...


7 posted on 07/08/2025 6:36:21 AM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

“UN human right” = unhuman rights!


8 posted on 07/08/2025 7:02:10 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement! ThereonMaube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Hey Hey Ho Ho, the hos in the UN have to go!


9 posted on 07/08/2025 7:06:38 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Correction! America is a nation of LEGAL IMMIGRANTS! All of mine came here legally. No free stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
So called “gender-affirming care” isn't just a divisive social policy. It's a crime against humanity on the order of anything the Nazi torture doctors did.

We need to get out of the UN and declare them a terrorist organization.

10 posted on 07/08/2025 7:21:00 AM PDT by Salman (It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Isn’t the UN largely controlled by the bloc of Islamic countries (subject to veto by the Security Council)? Why do they put up with this?


11 posted on 07/08/2025 7:23:20 AM PDT by UnwashedPeasant (The pandemic we suffer from is not COVID. It is Marxist Democrat Leftism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant
Isn’t the UN largely controlled by the bloc of Islamic countries (subject to veto by the Security Council)? Why do they put up with this?
Because it's influence not control. The Muslims get a free pass on "human rights" and support opposing Israel. And that's all they want from it.

China and Russia use the UN to look after their own interests. In theory so does the USA, but you know ...

But otherwise it's the same old globalist deep state.

12 posted on 07/08/2025 7:46:02 AM PDT by Salman (It's not a slippery slope if it was part of the program all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
It is increasingly obvious the UN is doing the Devil's work.

The US needs to get out of the UN and close their Satanic NY headquarters immediately. Such a vile organization has no place in our country.

13 posted on 07/08/2025 7:52:11 AM PDT by Gritty (The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the Revolution. - Saul Alinsky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson