In Braidwood, the court holds today that the appointment of the task force members is consistent with the Constitution.
The court holds specifically that the task force members can be removed at will by the Secretary of HHS, and their recommendations about preventive services are reviewaable by the secretary before they take effect.
Thomas’s dissent contends that the majority erroneously relied on a new theory that the government “invented” on appeal.
KAVANAUGH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and SOTOMAYOR, KAGAN, BARRETT, and JACKSON, JJ., joined. THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which ALITO and GORSUCH, JJ., joined