Skip to comments.
More than 130 retired judges urge federal court to drop charges against Wisconsin judge Hannah Dugan ('judicial immunity')
See BS 'News' ^
| 5/30/25
| Kierra Frazier
Posted on 05/31/2025 5:08:27 AM PDT by Libloather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-134 last
To: Libloather
I didn’t realize, helping an illegal alien escape from ICE, is one of her official duties.
121
posted on
05/31/2025 11:52:27 AM PDT
by
Ez2BRepub
(Democrats Suck)
To: Libloather
A bipartisan group of more than 130 retired judges and and 51 secret service and FIB agents too.
122
posted on
05/31/2025 12:33:13 PM PDT
by
Vaduz
To: Libloather
they think what she did was an official act?
thank goodness they are retired
To: Libloather
she is entitled to absolute immunity for her official acts What BS - helping the illegal wasn't an official act - it was as personal as they come.
124
posted on
05/31/2025 2:54:27 PM PDT
by
grobdriver
(The CDC can KMA!)
To: Libloather
How is breaking the law an official act?
125
posted on
05/31/2025 3:00:54 PM PDT
by
Colorado Doug
(Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
To: Libloather
"she is entitled to absolute immunity for her official acts."Then the combined expertise of 130 judges should be able to produce the LAW that states this - RIGHT?
126
posted on
05/31/2025 3:40:24 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: DesertRhino
Yes! Us inquiring minds want to know!
127
posted on
05/31/2025 3:41:26 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: _longranger81
Copilot says:
“she is entitled to absolute immunity for her official acts.” judge
This statement refers to the legal principle of judicial immunity, which protects judges from being sued or prosecuted for actions taken in their official capacity. However, this immunity is not absolute in all circumstances.
A recent case involving Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan has brought this issue into the spotlight. Dugan was indicted on federal charges for allegedly obstructing immigration authorities and preventing the arrest of an individual at her courthouse. A group of 138 retired judges has argued that she should not be prosecuted because she is entitled to absolute immunity for her official acts. However, critics argue that her actions were outside the scope of her judicial duties and should not be protected under judicial immunity2.
The debate centers on whether her conduct—allegedly helping someone evade law enforcement—falls within the scope of her official judicial responsibilities. Some legal experts assert that judicial immunity applies only to decisions made on the bench, not actions taken outside of formal court proceedings.
128
posted on
05/31/2025 3:44:56 PM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Political Junkie Too
They twist things around so much I feel like Norman in the Star Trek episode “I Mudd”.
129
posted on
05/31/2025 3:45:10 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
To: Libloather
More than 50million law abiding Americans want to see her prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, fired and de barred.
To: Libloather
"she is entitled to absolute immunity for her official acts."Sheltering criminal aliens is not an official act.
131
posted on
05/31/2025 8:33:48 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: BobL
Anthony Blinken put this together?
132
posted on
05/31/2025 10:27:30 PM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(Every Goliath has his David. Child in need ofand thhere we CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
To: Libloather
"A bipartisan group of more than 130 retired judges filed a brief Friday urging a federal court to drop charges against Wisconsin judge Hannah Dugan, saying her arrest undermines 'centuries of precedent on judicial immunity.'"
I might have expected that 130 retired judges would feel a professional responsibility to police the ethics of currently serving judges rather than allowing that task to fall to others less qualified. Perhaps that time is past, so now maybe we've got one conservative judge in a partisan group of 130 who went back to the tavern after using the get-out-of-jail-free card received for signing a letter.
133
posted on
06/01/2025 2:12:44 AM PDT
by
clearcarbon
(Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
To: Libloather
She will get the charges dismissed by a friendly judge. She claims that she was simply managing her docket, which is an official act. Since that was an official act, she claims absolute immunity.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-134 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson