Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Just Got a Game-Changing Legal Victory
PJ Media ^ | 4 May 2025 | Matt Margolis

Posted on 05/04/2025 12:35:24 PM PDT by Rummyfan

When President Trump returned to the White House, he didn’t just get to work cleaning up Joe Biden’s mess—he set his sights on dismantling decades of entrenched bureaucratic bloat, waste, and corruption. With a relentless series of executive orders and policy directives, Trump reignited his mission to drain the swamp—this time with laser precision and zero patience for the status quo.

Predictably, the left went into full-blown panic mode. Liberal legal groups immediately launched a barrage of lawsuits, cherry-picking friendly courts in a shameless attempt to stall Trump’s agenda. They’re terrified of losing control over the bloated regulatory state they’ve used for years to push policies they could never pass through Congress.

But that strategy just hit a major roadblock. In a landmark ruling on Saturday, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals handed the Trump administration a decisive legal victory—one that could fundamentally change how activist judges and forum-shopped cases interfere with executive authority.

...

The appeals court's 2-1 ruling Saturday emphasized the judiciary's deference to executive authority in matters concerning federal employment and contractual decisions.

The court noted that the district court likely lacked jurisdiction to interfere with the administration's personnel actions and funding decisions, particularly regarding grant agreements with non-federal entities like Radio Free Asia and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks.

This ruling effectively reins in district courts that have been sidestepping proper jurisdictional channels in cases challenging Trump administration actions. The decision serves as a clear reminder that courts themselves must operate within their prescribed legal boundaries.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: judgewatch; lawfare; obstruction; winning

1 posted on 05/04/2025 12:35:24 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

“likely lacked” ????


2 posted on 05/04/2025 12:51:38 PM PDT by oldasrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
This ruling effectively reins in district courts

Perhaps. The democRATS and DemoKKKrats never stop lying, cheating, attacking, and destroying.

First, last, and always, they need and want money and power. They have to lie and cheat. To openly, in a speech or debate, to openly admit what they want would be a disaster. Yes, there are too many skulls full of mush that are brainwashed, but there are many, many more of us. In every fair election, when looking at all of the counties in the United States, there is a huuuuge sea of red. That sea of red is no longer just Republican. It is the Tea Party, the MAGA party. Huuuuge numbers of black and Hispanic MEN voted for President Trump. In President Trump, they see a real man, a real American, who can absolutely answer the question: What is a Woman?

The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.

3 posted on 05/04/2025 12:54:52 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Were is this case heading next — POTUS?


4 posted on 05/04/2025 1:00:46 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (The judges are ganging up against the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

I expect the plaintiffs will move for a rehearing en banc which may reverse the three-judge ruling. If so, it will then go to SCOTUS. Given SCOTUS’s recent track record, they might just refuse to accept the case or if they do slow-roll any decision until next summer.

Then again, the left might just take this loss and hope the court’s ruling is not applied more widely in hopes to live to fight another day. In other words, they may just ignore it and forge on having Boasberg and Howell give them the court rulings and injunctions they want. The left is not known for adhering to court rulings they don’t like.


5 posted on 05/04/2025 1:19:10 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

“If so, it will then go to SCOTUS.”

***********

IOW to the Gang of Five.


6 posted on 05/04/2025 2:09:31 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

the other extremely important implication to this ruling is that SCOTUS is currently deliberating on these very issues themselevs, and it’s likely that this ruling will influence their decisions ...


7 posted on 05/04/2025 2:14:11 PM PDT by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

“The decision serves as a clear reminder that courts themselves must operate within their prescribed legal boundaries.”

Those courts knew that before the “reminder”. They will continue to do as they damn well please because that is what people who wipe their ass with the law do.


8 posted on 05/04/2025 2:23:21 PM PDT by TalBlack (Their god is government. Prepare for a religious war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus III
Huuuuge numbers of black and Hispanic MEN voted for President Trump. In President Trump, they see a real man, a real American, who can absolutely answer the question: What is a Woman?

It wouldn't have been possible if 2020 didn't happen. They had to witness what was happening with Joe Biden's cover up. And the MSM had spent most of the 4 years gaslighting the American Public into believing that there was nothing wrong with Joe Biden.

Journos who joined gaslighting on Biden’s decline should never live it down

9 posted on 05/04/2025 2:27:34 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Here is the court’s decision. It’s only about a dozen pages and worth the read. Notice where they cite previous SCOTUS decisions in similar cases. The dissent from the leftist just is as expected and is longer than the ruling itself so you can skip the final 15 pages or so.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cadc.41991/gov.uscourts.cadc.41991.01208736131.0.pdf


10 posted on 05/04/2025 2:30:24 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Until Congress reforms the maggots in the so-called Judiciary, Trump and America will always be loser. The first thing we need to do is throw all foreign freeloading bass turds out of the judiciary and then on out of the country. What the hell are those losers doing trying to tell Americans how we should live. Deport all of them. Let them take that crap home from where they came from and see how long they survive there where the race card is as worthless as teats on a bull.


11 posted on 05/04/2025 4:15:25 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (When it comes to politics, women are bigger crooks than men. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson