Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WATCH: Sen. John Kennedy Destroys Nationwide Injunctions
PJ Media ^ | April 1, 2025 | Matt Margolis

Posted on 04/01/2025 12:38:02 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) and his unmatched ability to dismantle weak arguments with his signature Southern wit. On Monday, during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, he was at the top of his game, systematically exposing the complete lack of legal authority for district judges to issue universal injunctions — a favorite tactic of the left to block Trump’s agenda.

Questioning Assistant Attorney General nominee Brett Shumate, Kennedy systematically dismantled any justification for these sweeping judicial orders.

"Mr. Shumate, what's a universal injunction?" Kennedy asked.

Shumate explained, "Senator, a universal injunction is an order from a court enjoining the government in a way that goes beyond the parties to the case but applies nationwide or in some cases universally."

Kennedy pressed further, asking, "What's the statutory basis for a federal judge issuing an order that affects people other than the parties before the court?"

"I'm not aware of a statutory basis, Senator," Shumate admitted.

"There is no statutory basis, is there?" Kennedy reiterated.

"No, Senator," Shumate confirmed.

Kennedy then challenged Shumate to name a Supreme Court ruling that interprets the Constitution to allow such injunctions.

"Can you name me that case?" he asked.

"I'm not aware of one, Senator," Shumate responded.

"There isn't one, is there?" Kennedy pressed.

"I'm not aware of one, Senator," Shumate repeated.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: corruption; courts; injunction; judges
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
Wow, Kennedy eviscerated the candidate. It's worth reading the whole thing. There is NO LEGAL or CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS whatsoever for "Universal Injunctions." NONE.

A bit more follows...


Kennedy then laid out the fundamental issue: "You have a plaintiff and a defendant, and the plaintiff files a lawsuit in federal court. The judge has jurisdiction over those parties. How can a federal judge issue an order that affects everyone else outside of that courtroom?"

"It shouldn't be possible, Senator, but district courts do it all the time," Shumate admitted. "I think on the theory that courts need to enjoin a federal policy from going into effect, and they often will enjoin it nationwide so that all non-parties are protected."

"I thought that if you wanted to affect parties who aren't in court, you had to file a class action," Kennedy countered.

"That's correct, Senator," Shumate agreed.

Kennedy pointed out that instead of filing class actions, plaintiffs often seek universal injunctions, which have no legal foundation.

"Does this encourage forum shopping?" he asked.

"Yes, Senator. Not only does it encourage forum shopping, but also district shopping and filing multiple strategic lawsuits to find one judge who will enjoin a single policy nationwide," Shumate said. "If you have five lawsuits, only one of those cases needs to be successful."

Kennedy then points out that judges issued only about 27 universal injunctions in the entire 20th century.

"But 86 of them were issued against President Trump in his first term. Is that correct?" Kennedy asked.

"I don't know the specific number, but it was a high number," Shumate conceded.

"And so far in President Trump's second term, 30 universal injunctions have been issued against him. Have they not?" Kennedy continued.

"Senator, I don't have the specific number, but that sounds about right," Shumate said.

"The universal injunction has become a weapon against the Trump administration, has it not?" Kennedy asked.

"Yes," Shumate affirmed.


Just look at how this "Universal Injunction" weapon is used against President Trump!
* 20th Century: 0.3 per year
* Trump 45: 22 per year
* Trump 47: 154 per year.
1 posted on 04/01/2025 12:38:02 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

He says a lot, Kennedy. It’s often interesting sometimes amusing. Does he do anything?


2 posted on 04/01/2025 12:40:35 PM PDT by stanne (Because they were mesmerized by Obama, the man for whom this was named, whose name they left out of )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

For your comment…


3 posted on 04/01/2025 12:40:56 PM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Bump


4 posted on 04/01/2025 12:42:03 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Ok another great oral argument expressed. But these injunctions stay active and Trump’s and our agenda remain hobbled. Do something


5 posted on 04/01/2025 12:43:55 PM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

“He says a lot, Kennedy. It’s often interesting sometimes amusing. Does he do anything?”

The answer is no. He’s fun to watch but he’s a typical moderate. Trey Gowdy was that way too.


6 posted on 04/01/2025 12:47:54 PM PDT by Mr. N. Wolfe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stanne

No. They all like to talk.


7 posted on 04/01/2025 12:49:58 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stanne

Kennedy’s role is seminal. You will notice that if he is talking about something, it won’t be long before the wheels are rolling in the direction of a passable bill.


8 posted on 04/01/2025 12:54:52 PM PDT by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

THIS is the heart of the issue! Trump needs to get this to SCOTUS where it will be stopped.


9 posted on 04/01/2025 12:55:52 PM PDT by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Grassley has introduced a bill to restrict district judges


10 posted on 04/01/2025 12:56:15 PM PDT by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lurk

“ Kennedy’s role is seminal. You will notice that if he is talking about something, it won’t be long before the wheels are rolling in the direction of a passable bill.”

That’s what I was wondering

Ok that’s acceptable. I think that’s correct


11 posted on 04/01/2025 12:59:16 PM PDT by stanne (Because they were mesmerized by Obama, the man for whom this was named, whose name they left out of )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Johnson did not eviscerate Shumate.

Johnson was preaching to the choir. Shumate agreed with and supported Johnson’s well placed diatribe. Johnson was simply reading his discourse into the congressional record.

Had this been a Biden nomineee arguing with Johnson then the breathless headlines would be merited.


12 posted on 04/01/2025 1:01:50 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Johnson didn’t destroy nationwide injunctions. That would require legislation to be passed. This is just jawboning.


13 posted on 04/01/2025 1:03:35 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Brett Shumate is a Trump nominee. He is not lobbying for nationwide injunctions.


14 posted on 04/01/2025 1:05:31 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne

“He says a lot, Kennedy. It’s often interesting sometimes amusing. Does he do anything?”

He’s just our mascot, Festus Haggen reincarnated. Much like Barbie Bondi, speaks nice words but is ineffective. An entertainer.

Understand that he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, and his “aw shucks” shtick is theater. Vanderbilt University, University of Virginia School of Law, Oxford University. (Someone here said that he was so wealthy that “even his butler had a butler”.)


15 posted on 04/01/2025 1:05:33 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

He wasn’t trying to eviscerate Shumate. He was using him to make a point about what’s been going on. Shumate is Trump’s nominee


16 posted on 04/01/2025 1:10:19 PM PDT by nuconvert ( Warning: Accused of being a radical militarist. Approach with caution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iamgalt

No shit.

I’m wondering when some people on the right start camping out in front of a judges home and make THEIR lives miserable 24/7 like the freaks do to conservatives?

Or the solution described in the Tom Kratman book, Caliphate.


17 posted on 04/01/2025 1:11:35 PM PDT by L,TOWM (An upraised middle finger is my virtue signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Kennedy eviscerated the policy,. My interpretation was that the candidate also opposed this goofy lawfare.


18 posted on 04/01/2025 1:12:14 PM PDT by daku
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. N. Wolfe; stanne

Jim Jordan, too. Brilliant mind, excellent interlocutor in hearings...but what happens? NOTHING.


19 posted on 04/01/2025 1:12:22 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (PDJT doesn’t just walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death. He swaggers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

IOW, is it time yet to show this judge and the judicial branch, and CJ Roberts, who endorsed J. Boasberg... the respect they have shown the executive branch?

By ignoring them?


20 posted on 04/01/2025 1:15:24 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson