Skip to comments.
6 Unbelievably Scammy Federal Practices DOGE Staff Reveal In Fox Interview
https://thefederalist.com ^
| March 28, 2025
| Joy Pullmann
Posted on 03/28/2025 11:19:13 AM PDT by bitt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
1
posted on
03/28/2025 11:19:13 AM PDT
by
bitt
To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...
2
posted on
03/28/2025 11:19:26 AM PDT
by
bitt
(<img src=' 'width=30%>)
To: bitt
FOX needs to rerun this so more people can watch.
3
posted on
03/28/2025 11:20:39 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: bitt
Please let me know when some high level bureaucrats and politicians are held accountable and sentenced to prison!!
To: 1Old Pro
This needs to happen. Run it as often as they can, only because every other media outlet will just snippets and then bring a pundit on with their own opinion for 15 minutes. Who cares what they think.
5
posted on
03/28/2025 11:22:15 AM PDT
by
Dominic01
(Political correctness has become a psychosis)
To: bitt
6
posted on
03/28/2025 11:27:43 AM PDT
by
Pollard
(Zone 6b)
To: 1Old Pro
Much better if Trump had a weekly news conference exposing the most fragrant frauds of the week.
7
posted on
03/28/2025 11:30:23 AM PDT
by
aquila48
(Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you i9s how they. control you. )
To: 1Old Pro
“the federal government was paying nearly $1 billion for an online national parks survey that resulted in no changes or other outcomes as a result of giving the survey. He said the survey should have cost $10,000.”
I suspect the company doing this survey was either making a very large campaign donation back to one or more pols. OR the company that got this survey is related to some pol.
Typically government contracts like this are put out to bid.
If the government paid $1B for something that should have cost $10K there needs to be a criminal investigation.
Think if you as a government purchasing agent had to buy a tractor for a park. Instead of paying $10K for a small John Deer tractor you paid $1 Billion for that same tractor.
To: woodbutcher1963
I suspect the company doing this survey was either making a very large campaign donation back to one or more pols. OR the company that got this survey is related to some pol. Typically government contracts like this are put out to bid. If the government paid $1B for something that should have cost $10K there needs to be a criminal investigation.Yes, Pam Bondi needs to investigate many of these things that are being uncovered, even these social security frauds being revealed.
9
posted on
03/28/2025 11:37:01 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: aquila48
Much better if Trump had a weekly news conference exposing the most fragrant frauds of the week.Yes... they stink on ice!
10
posted on
03/28/2025 11:37:42 AM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: bitt
11
posted on
03/28/2025 11:39:20 AM PDT
by
Beowulf9
( )
To: woodbutcher1963
Think if you as a government purchasing agent had to buy a tractor for a park. Instead of paying $10K for a small John Deer tractor you paid $1 Billion for that same tractor.Then left it to rot in a field.
12
posted on
03/28/2025 11:40:09 AM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: bitt
“…nearly $1 billion for an online national parks survey”
That’s pretty hard to believe. I’d love to see details of this.
13
posted on
03/28/2025 11:41:44 AM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(PDJT doesn’t just walk through the Valley of the Shadow of Death. He swaggers.)
To: bitt
It’s a feature, Elon, not a bug.
14
posted on
03/28/2025 11:44:08 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: pgyanke
Check my math.
It would actually be like buying 100,000 $10K tractors and then letting them rot out in the field.
To: woodbutcher1963
That isn’t the point. They paid $1 billion for a $10,000 tractor... and let it rot in the field.
If they had 100,000 tractors, they would at least have something to show for it... rotting or not.
16
posted on
03/28/2025 11:51:59 AM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
To: bitt
and the inspector generals do what?
17
posted on
03/28/2025 11:53:22 AM PDT
by
joshua c
To: 1Old Pro
18
posted on
03/28/2025 11:58:45 AM PDT
by
TexasGator
(''1'111'111111111/)
To: pgyanke
True Dat.
I guess I should have said they COULD have bought 100,000 tractors instead of ONE.
To: aquila48
20
posted on
03/28/2025 12:05:45 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson