Hey Nessie: Try Johnson vs Mississippi from 1867.It said a court cannot interfered judicially when a PRESIDENT is doing his ascribed duties. And as the CEO OF THE GOVERNMENT which is exactly what any PRESIDENT IS he can do it. The 1867 court said any attempt to stop what he is doing cannot be justified legally. IN otherwards NESSIE. Butt out! you bloviated nimrod
lex
a judicial attempt to interfere with the performance of such duties would be “an absurd and excessive extravagance.” The Court noted that if the President chose to ignore the injunction, the judiciary would be unable to enforce the order.from that 1867 case which has not been overturned!lex