Posted on 02/12/2025 8:23:26 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Excellently said.
This has to be the course. These rulings clearly attempt to control the executive branch and its every move, an area that is beyond their authority - coequal branches of government. The web page stuff is probably the best example. What’s next, they want to be the editor of the text?
It can’t be allowed to continue unchecked, otherwise we’re asking for judicial tyranny (well, already there).
.
WITH TODAY’S ELECTRONIC WORLD OF RECORDS-—HOW EASY IS IT TO DIG INTO JUDGES LIVES & INCOME SOURCES???
Uh... sure they can.
The Executive branch has to follow Federal law - statutes.
An excellent article!
The damn Marbury decision...I first read about this in the late 70s when I began to wonder how the SC could jump its jurisdiction for the Roe decision.
Every judge appointed by Obama and Biden needs to be investigated, and that includes the 3 DEI schlumps on the SC.
Purge the judicial system of every activist traitor. They are only there to push the agenda.
Yes, they do, but they have no compunction to obey unconstitutional orders from a low level activist judge.
RE: The Executive branch has to follow Federal law - statutes.
Ok, a federal judge ordered Trump to restore the web pages of several agencies that promote transgenderism. See here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4296879/posts
What statutes did Trump violate?
None. The actions were in compliance with a legitimate executive order banning all the woke crap in the US Govt.
“What statutes did Trump violate?”
“...The APA empowers this Court to “hold unlawful and set aside” agency
action that is “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in
accordance with law,” 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), or taken “without observance of procedure required by law,” id. § 706(2)(D).”
The Plaintiffs allege in part the Executive:
...
“39. Because it provided no advance public notice before removing the
webpages and datasets, CDC failed to comply with the PRA requirement that an
agency must “provide adequate notice when initiating, substantially modifying, or
terminating significant information dissemination products.” Id.
40. Because it removed webpages and datasets that convey information it
still possesses, CDC failed to comply with the PRA requirement that an agency
“ensure that the public has timely and equitable access to the agency’s public
information. Id.
41. By removing the webpages and datasets in violation of the PRA, CDC
and HHS failed to observe procedures required by law, or took agency action that was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or not in accordance with the PRA, in contravention of the APA.”
- see pp. 15-16 at https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.277069/gov.uscourts.dcd.277069.1.0_5.pdf
President Trump and other Presidents have been critical of the APA. This may be setting the table for an APA challenge at USSC.
RE: provide adequate notice when initiating, substantially modifying, or
terminating significant information dissemination products
Who is the court to decide that transgenderism is a significant information dissemination product?
We’re they elected to make such decisions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.