Skip to comments.
Federal judge pauses deadline for federal workers to accept Trump’s resignation offer
CNN ^
| 2/6/2025
| By Tami Luhby, Alayna Treene and Tierney Sneed
Posted on 02/06/2025 11:04:14 AM PST by NohSpinZone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: NohSpinZone
Any legal eagles here that can offer some idea of a plan to cease judicial tyranny?
To: ridesthemiles
Time to be shed of the Gov Unions for good
there were none until JFK.
MAGA
42
posted on
02/06/2025 12:09:38 PM PST
by
Gasshog
To: NohSpinZone
The purpose off the judiciary is to interpret the law. Exactly what law is this judge “interpreting”?
Government by judicial fiat is getting old - and I doubt that this was the intention of the Founding Fathers.
To: NohSpinZone
When is the return to work deadline?
44
posted on
02/06/2025 12:17:06 PM PST
by
McGavin999
( A sense of humor is a sign of intelligence, leftists have no sense of humor, therefore……)
To: NohSpinZone
Just do it anyway, how many divisions does this judge have anyway?
45
posted on
02/06/2025 1:00:16 PM PST
by
Bobalu
(I can’t even feign surprise anymore...)
To: NohSpinZone
do it anyway. Biden and Obama did.
46
posted on
02/06/2025 1:09:32 PM PST
by
AbolishCSEU
(Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
To: Sarah Barracuda
Yep. just go ahead and do it. Even SCOTUS didn’t stop BI-Dung from doing his evil unconstitutional EOs.
47
posted on
02/06/2025 1:10:37 PM PST
by
AbolishCSEU
(Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
To: kaktuskid
Yep. Fight fire with fire.
48
posted on
02/06/2025 1:11:07 PM PST
by
AbolishCSEU
(Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
To: Sgt_Schultze
Yep the precedent has been set under Demonrat rule. Just do it.
49
posted on
02/06/2025 1:12:56 PM PST
by
AbolishCSEU
(Amount of "child" support paid is inversely proportionate to mother's actual parenting of children)
To: NohSpinZone
50
posted on
02/06/2025 1:15:19 PM PST
by
newfreep
("There is no race problem...just a problem race")
To: newfreep
51
posted on
02/06/2025 1:16:16 PM PST
by
newfreep
("There is no race problem...just a problem race")
To: newfreep
I would have just issued a termination order right on the spot..just watch, on Monday it will be extended again
To: NohSpinZone
Where are the pro-American federal judges who will put a stop to this crap?
53
posted on
02/06/2025 1:35:03 PM PST
by
dynachrome
(Auslander Raus!)
To: Sarah Barracuda
I would put out a notice for federal employees to contact their union reps. Tell them this is a one time offer. If it is thrown out by this judge, terminations will begin without the generous buyout package. Then point out that public sector unions were created by executive order, and can be rescinded by executive order.
To: NohSpinZone
F**k John Marshall and "judicial supremacy."
Let The Bobs cook!
To: NohSpinZone
56
posted on
02/06/2025 2:00:04 PM PST
by
chuckb87
To: newfreep
57
posted on
02/06/2025 2:03:08 PM PST
by
WildHighlander57
((the more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.) )
To: Sarah Barracuda
Fine, Trump doesnt need to offer them any buyout, just fire them NOW..he’s well within his right to do so
OK, but who? Every single federal worker? Air Traffic Controllers? ICE? DoD?
58
posted on
02/06/2025 2:19:28 PM PST
by
Mr.Unique
(My boss wants me to sign up for a 401K. No way I'm running that far! )
To: kaktuskid
Time to go Andrew Jackson. Or Joe Biden.There is precedent. Joe Biden ignored the SCOTUS' decision on student loans and had them paid off anyway.
The SCOTUS is not even involved here. All Trump had to do was to say that the judge did not have the constitutional authority to intervene and it was up to the SCOTUS if they wanted to do something about it.
To: MNJohnnie
The only recourse is for Congress to limit judicial appointments, all of them to 15 years. No lifetime appointments, even to the Supreme Court.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
