Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ Pregnancy Center Appeals to Supreme Court
Ministry Watch ^ | January 27, 2025 | Kim Roberts

Posted on 01/27/2025 8:55:05 PM PST by Morgana

First Choice Women’s Resource Centers, a group of pregnancy resource centers in New Jersey, has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to consider its case about the state asking it to disclose information about its donors.

In November 2023, New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin demanded that First Choice turn over many documents, including information it provides to clients, statements about abortion pill reversal, documents about personnel and outside organizations with which it works, and donor information.

Platkin has openly expressed his hostility toward pregnancy centers. “He issued a consumer alert—drafted with the help of Planned Parenthood—complaining that such centers do not provide or refer for abortion. He also signed an open letter pledging to take legal action against pregnancy centers,” the brief to the Supreme Court reads.

Alliance Defending Freedom, on behalf of First Choice, challenged the attorney general’s subpoena based on the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The subpoena chills the right to freedom of association and freedom of speech, the brief argues.

The federal courts dismissed the case, claiming it was not ripe until the state court enforced the subpoena. The attorney general then filed an enforcement action in state court.

The state court granted enforcement of the subpoena, but it declined to decide the federal constitutional claims raised by First Choice, finding them “premature.”

First Choice filed an appeal, but meanwhile, it began producing some documents requested by the subpoena.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit sent the case back to the federal district court, now stating that First Choice’s claims were ripe. However, in taking up the motion for an injunction, the federal district court again declared the claims would not be ripe until the state court “require[s] the subpoena recipient to respond to the subpoena under threat of contempt.”

Again First Choice appealed to the Third Circuit. The majority there said the case was still not ripe because the pregnancy center could still assert its constitutional claims in the state court.

“The lower courts have wrongly held that First Choice is relegated to state court to present its constitutional claims. That is inconsistent with civil rights law and with the First Amendment,” ADF Senior Counsel Erin Hawley said in a press statement.

There is a split in the U.S. Courts of Appeal about how to handle this question of whether a state investigatory claim has to be adjudicated in state court before a federal court has jurisdiction. “The Third and Fifth Circuits impose this state-court litigation requirement, but the Ninth Circuit holds that a concrete injury caused by the challenged subpoena satisfies Article III,” the brief states.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionpill; attorneygeneral; chemicalabortion; matthewplatkin; medicalabortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; newjersey; pregnancycenter; prolife

1 posted on 01/27/2025 8:55:05 PM PST by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Our judicial system is such bull 💩. Back and forth snd back. How f’ing hard us it to make a damn decision. Lawyers are so retarded it takes fifty of them to interpret the shit they wrote.


2 posted on 01/27/2025 9:40:39 PM PST by chuckb87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Braindead New Jersey AG Matthew Platkin demanded that the pro-lifers turn over documents,
<><>including information it provides to clients,
<><>statements about abortion pill reversal,
<><>documents about personnel and outside organizations with which it works,
<><>and donor information.

Hate filled Platkin has openly expressed his hostility toward pro-life pregnancy centers.

He’s so dumb. he issued a “consumer alert” that was drafted with the help of the condom-clad Planned Parenthood zeros.

The know-nothings complained that such centers do not provide or refer for abortion.

Platkin pledged to take legal action against pregnancy centers, in exchange for a lifetime supply of condoms.


3 posted on 01/27/2025 11:17:59 PM PST by Liz ((This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Platkin has openly expressed his hostility toward pregnancy centers.
He issued a consumer alert—drafted with the help of Planned Parenthood—complaining that such centers do not provide or refer for abortion.

I think he missed the entire reason for their existence.


4 posted on 01/28/2025 4:15:28 AM PST by Iron Munro ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities" - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckb87
How f’ing hard us it to make a damn decision. Lawyers are so retarded it takes fifty of them to interpret the shit they wrote.

They do it to create more busy-work and more billable hours for themselves.

Those multi-million dollar estate mansions, supercars and trophy wives don't pay for themselves you know.....


5 posted on 01/28/2025 4:23:13 AM PST by Iron Munro ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities" - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson