This and border security is why I voted for this guy a third time. Winning! Now will the Supremes use Wong 1898 to strike this down is the question.
“...the Supremes use Wong 1898 to strike this down...”
-
No, and it would not be the first time
the Supreme Court overruled themselves.
On the contrary, SCOTUS’ decision in Wong Kim Ark should uphold this measure. Had it not been for the 1882 Chinese Immigration Act, the Wong Court said Ark’s parents would have been permanent residents, and thus, Ark was a 14A ยง1, birthright citizen.
See Chevron and Roe
The Wong decision was a 6-2 decision with one Justice not voting, so it’s not a slam dunk decision. There is room for debate. Let it begin again.