Skip to comments.
Drone Swarm in Virginia Shows Concerning Gaps and Seams in Homeland Security
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^
| 10/17/2024
| JOHN MILLS
Posted on 10/17/2024 7:58:29 PM PDT by bitt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
10/17/2024 7:58:29 PM PDT
by
bitt
To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...
2
posted on
10/17/2024 7:58:42 PM PDT
by
bitt
(<img src=' 'width=30%>)
To: bitt
I have, yet another, dumb question.
Wouldn’t an aircraft with downward looking RADAR see these things, see where they come from, and see where they go?
3
posted on
10/17/2024 8:02:07 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: bitt
“In December 2023, for 17 continuous days, a fleet of drones appeared at night over Langley Air Force Base (AFB), Virginia and other facilities in the greater Virginia Beach area.”
WOW... the government would never scam us. I guess we better make drones illegal and further lockdown America. A police state is a safe state.
4
posted on
10/17/2024 8:04:06 PM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
To: BenLurkin
Careful, your critical thinking skills are showing. I hope you are not suggesting that since the DC area is one of the most closely watched by sensors and radar in America, and therefore they might be lying to us again.
5
posted on
10/17/2024 8:06:18 PM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
To: BenLurkin
I'd be VERY surprised if we don't have satellite surveillance that is watching them nonstop.
It's a technical challenge to discriminate a small object against the reflection coming back from the earth. But you can use Doppler radar to detect small MOVING objects against the background echo from the earth. So, yes, I would imagine surveillance aircraft could track those moving drones. More here...
Look-down/shoot-down Radar
6
posted on
10/17/2024 8:11:54 PM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(It should be illegal to be here illegally. It should be a crime to be committing crimes in the USA.)
To: BenLurkin
***I have, yet another, dumb question. Wouldn’t an aircraft with downward looking RADAR see these things, see where they come from, and see where they go?***
Perhaps no one who should have cared was paying any attention. Certainly that infamous 'weather balloon' was seen but until civilians saw it and raised a flock of questions, nothing was even said. It was a serious oversight because I have seen a picture of that same Chinese air frame with four hypersonic missiles suspended underneath - a FIRST STRIKE weapon!
7
posted on
10/17/2024 8:14:01 PM PDT
by
Bob Ireland
(The Democrap Party is the enemy of freedom.They use all the seductions and deceits of the Bolshevics)
To: bitt
“Gaps and seams” must be a nice way to refer to their politicization and incompetence.
8
posted on
10/17/2024 8:14:52 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: bitt
And we have no clue? Gimme a break.
9
posted on
10/17/2024 8:17:31 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: bitt
I don’t have a WSJ account, but my husband does, so he showed me the related article a day or two ago. It is very disturbing. Yet, our government seems to be perplexed as to who could be behind this, and why. They don’t seem to care about national security much at all. It’s WAAYYY more important to keep Donald Trump from being re-elected.
10
posted on
10/17/2024 8:21:44 PM PDT
by
FamiliarFace
(I got my own way of livin' But everything gets done With a southern accent Where I come from. TPetty)
To: bitt
Flying too low for radar?
11
posted on
10/17/2024 8:24:57 PM PDT
by
heartwood
(If you're looking for the /sarc tag, you just passed it..)
To: bitt
Sounds like a CIA election physops. OOOOhhhhh bad man Trump and the russians.
To: bitt
Those aliens are smart! Disguising their planetary surveillance craft as domestic military drones.
13
posted on
10/17/2024 8:56:22 PM PDT
by
citizen
(Political incrementalism is like compound interest for liberals - every little bit adds up.)
To: bitt
History repeats itself, again.
To: BenLurkin
It would first have to be a very sensitive radar to see the small radar cross section of a drone. Many of them are in the -15 to -20 dBsm range for X and Ka Bands (8-12.4 and 26.5-40 GHz). A 0 dbsm RCS is the equivalent reflection of a 1 meter square plate. You could also look for prop modulations and/or doppler but they’re still mostly made of plastic.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9032332
15
posted on
10/17/2024 10:26:37 PM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: Gaffer
16
posted on
10/17/2024 10:50:50 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: bitt; Openurmind; Churchjack; eastforker; Levy78; maddog55; Jonty30; GingisK; Mark17; ...
17
posted on
10/18/2024 2:55:00 AM PDT
by
RoosterRedux
(Thinking objectively is difficult. And painful. That’s why many people just cling to their biases.)
To: bitt
I bet security would be tighter if we didn’t have a Chicom meat puppet as “CinC.”
18
posted on
10/18/2024 2:58:09 AM PDT
by
Flag_This
(They're lying.)
To: BenLurkin
One of these was overhead at Langley during the swarm:
NASA’s WB-57Fs are specialized research aircraft that can be configured to carry a wide array of imaging and other sensors and equipment in their noses and other modular payload bays
19
posted on
10/18/2024 3:05:50 AM PDT
by
RoosterRedux
(Thinking objectively is difficult. And painful. That’s why many people just cling to their biases.)
To: Gaffer
These “drones” were the size of a car.
20
posted on
10/18/2024 3:07:52 AM PDT
by
RoosterRedux
(Thinking objectively is difficult. And painful. That’s why many people just cling to their biases.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson