So, have the debate at FOX. Make sure there is wireless jamming tech in use and make sure the moderators are balanced. No leaking of the questions in advance. Watch her world come tumbling down.
I’d be in favor of a real debate, not a campaign commercial like we were served this week. Two candidates, one stage, really debating one another without the interference of a moderator - just a time keeper. Lincoln - Douglas type debate in which one candidate gets an opening statement to state their case as to why they should be President. Say 3 - 4 minutes. Other candidate gets their opening statement - same amount of time. Then by flip of coin one candidate gets 30 seconds to pose a question to the other followed by that candidates 2 minute response and the questioners 1 minute rebuttal and comment on what was just heard. Alternate these questioning and response and rebuttal periods for whatever time is allotted, say 2 - 3 hours. Then whoever did not go first in opening statement has choice to close first or last in a 2 minute closing statement and final plea to the electorate.
We don’t need no stinking moderators. Let us judge the candidates on their own. The current “system” has become a biased, campaign contribution by one network on behalf of one candidate - there is no purpose for that !!
It worked for Lincoln, it can work now !