Posted on 09/13/2024 3:09:10 AM PDT by jerod
Exactly correct. No moderators and no outsider’s questions, just the two candidates with time limits
Ok, let's hear the plan....specific details.
She's had 3.5 years.
Harris needs the debates because she wants to do something other than pressers. Trump should NOT debate her and force her to talk to the press. She will try to use the debate vice a press conference. She was cackling in part of her speech yesterday and, at one point, sounded drunk again. That is probably not the case, but the whole country would see it if she did that during a presser.
Absolutely NO more debates. She is using the debate to avoid direct questions from the press. Trump would take the pressure off her by accepting any discussion. Natural moderators will not stop her from lying and calling him names.
The Art of the Deal. No more nor less.
I agree with everything you listed except about the audience. I think no audience works better for Americans to get real information from the candidates. It should not be a rally, but a serious discussion
FKH, Cheating Hoe.
".....discussion. Natural moderators will not stop her from lying and calling him names." Should have read "...debate. Natural moderators will not stop her from lying and calling him names." Editor apps are woke, and you have to watch them😀
A person posting at the Conservative Treehouse posted this today:
Harris campaign instructs reporters not to ask questions about ‘earrings’ or ‘debate cheating’. [Developing]
—
SHOCK REPORT Muir And Davis Instructed NOT to mention Trump assassination attempt according to sources. ‘And they were instructed to cut Trump off as soon as he mentioned it,’ said the source
—
KAMALA’S ANSWERS SCRIPTED:
AI analysis of voice patterns during the debate show that Harris was reading and not speaking spontaneously. [Developing]
https://nitter.poast.org/isource_news/status/1834495353883951222#m
BUSTED New source claims Kamala was secretly aided by a mini teleprompter disguised as a TV camera. ‘Trump would have never known the difference because it was pointed at her the whole time.’ [Developing
SHOCK REVELATION According to a highly confidential source ABC set up a ‘secret’ teleprompter only Harris could see. ‘It explained why no audience was allowed.
—
ABC SUBTERFUGE Network positioned bright lights into Trump’s eyes to make him squint and gaze down at the podium in contrast to Kamala’s chin up wide eyed look.
—
ABC HELPED KAMALA CHEAT According to sources the network coordinated closely with Harris. ‘Kamala was allowed to wear an earpiece and had access to the questions days ahead of the debate.’ [Developing]
iSource News @isource_news
20h
EARRINGS ‘MISSING’ Harris campaign sources say they were ‘most likely destroyed’ as part of ‘normal housekeeping’. ‘The earrings were costume jewelry which routinely gets changed.’ [Developing]
DEBATE EARRINGS DESTROYED Harris campaign sources say earrings Kamala wore during the debate were ‘costume jewelery’ and have been ‘disposed of’ due to ‘hygienic reasons’.
2
Reply
Belle
Belle
September 13, 2024 7:49 am
Reply to Charlotte99
So, the earrings were supposedly identified as Tiffany earrings. Now, they are saying they were costume jewelry. That tells that something was definitely hinky with the earrings.
You going to let Tucker and Bongino moderate?
The different lighting on each candidate is a strategy that the left has used for a long time. Usually it just makes Trump look unhealthy and his hair orange. Making him squint and look down seems a very possible (and disgusting ) tactic by the left.
Why can’t Trump insist that his own people go to these places and check out everything like lighting and microphones?
It won’t even matter if it is verifiably exposed that the lighting aimed at Trump was excessively bright. The left will either deny it or say …. Sorry, mistakes were made, lessons are learned and we won’t do it again. People who watch only the mainstream media will never hear a word about it
I can be easily dissuaded of the audience. I added it because it adds an extra level of stress to the public job interview.
You’re right it will never happen; the Democrats will never accept having to answer hard questions from moderators who are not bought and paid for, the entire point is to get Democrats to refuse to debate.
Agree to one debate where the Democratic Candidate sets the terms, one debate where the Republican candidate sets the terms.
The Democrat will refuse, then bombard them with refusing to debate, with Kamala she is refusing to do interviews and another debate with true conservatives asking the questions would be ideal to get her in a meltdown.
Now what happens is Democrats proposed rigged debates and Republicans reluctantly agree and then get into a bad situation, stop playing defense go on offense with the debates.
Why do we even need mods. Show the question and a timer on a screen and let the folks have at it. When times up , its up and you get 5 secs to finish your thought. Thats it. Then youre muted. No mod is better than a biased mod.
IMHO, Trump should decline to another debate. Harris keeps getting all cocky and keeps pushing for a debate. Then Trump relents and debates her.
She must have been pretty pathetic to need earrings to transmit instructions. I guess an audience would have hurt her ability to hear through her earrings.she must have to wear them everywhere.
Early voting
varies by location
In-person
Nov 5
********
Not going to change Early Voting IN-PERSON with it
being a local decision. It would take a NATIONAL
DECISION which most likely could never be agreed on.
They bussed in a ton of people to a rally for Kamala in NC yesterday. The place looked packed. She was back to how she usually acts making no sense and cackling.
Always that smirking and cackling.
Trump should say she agreed to one debate. Refused all others. She had her chance. Tough luck camalla. You chose poorly
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.