Aviation Impossibilities: Deconstructing the Official Story of the 9/11 Hijackings and Air Defense Failures

Aviation Impossibilities: Deconstructing the Official Story of the 9/11 Hijackings and Air Defense F ^ | 9/8/2024 | https://ic911.org/

[Pikachu_Dad]

In early 2024, the International Center for 9/11 Justice (IC911) embarked on the first stage of an in-depth study into what took place in the skies on September 11, 2001.

On September 8, 2024, IC911 and UK Column held an online symposium where we commemorated the 23rd anniversary of that day and shared IC911’s research to date. The symposium evaluated three key claims of the US government’s account:

That the alleged 9/11 hijackers could so smoothly and successfully commandeer all four airliners; That the alleged hijacker pilots could successfully fly three of the aircraft into their intended targets; That US air defenses failed to intercept the hijacked planes due to communication breakdowns and bad luck. IC911 Research Director Dr. Piers Robinson introduced the four-hour livestream event. Captain Dan Hanley, a pilot of 35 years and founder of 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers, then spoke about the importance of getting the world to understand that Muslim terrorists did not fly the planes on 9/11. Following their remarks, there were four presentations.

Program Note: The livestream begins at the 4:50 mark.

Opening Remarks By Dr. Piers Robinson, IC911 Research Director 4:50 – 14:50

Informing the World There Were No Muslim Hijackers on 9/11 By Captain Dan Hanley, 9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers 14:50 – 28:40

The 9/11 Hijacking Myth Exposed: Examining the Official Story Against the History of Suicide Hijacking Attempts and the Content of the 9/11 Phone Calls By Ted Walter, IC911 Executive Director 28:40 – 1:52:30

Assessing the Feasibility of the 9/11 Flight Profiles for Inexperienced and Experienced Pilots By Olivier Caron-Mason, Pilot and Former Flight Instructor 1:52:30 – 2:49:30

The 9/11 Flights: The Case for GPS-Guided Autopilot Control By Aidan Monaghan, Researcher 2:49:30 – 3:19:50

Lies and Obstruction: Indefensible Air Defenses on 9/11 By Kevin Ryan, Editor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies 3:19:50 – 3:55:10

[Pikachu_Dad]

Now we have the idiot, if prior speakers serve as our guide, Aidan Monaghan on ‘The 9/11 Flights: The case for GPS Guided Autopilot control’ 2:45

Mercifully short. Nothing of value. Just more bogus speculation.

[Pikachu_Dad]

Last speaker Kevin Ryan 3:15 “Lies and Obstruction: Indefensible Air Defenses on 9/11”

Speaker attacks:
Benedict Sliney FAA Command Center
General Micheal Canavan FAA Hijack Coordinator

Nothing of value in his talk either.

[citizen]

From what I read, the Towers structural construction was unique, having the building core area of the elevators, stairwells and vertical utility runs of pipes, conduits, etc and, at the exterior the wall column structures. In betwwen was a void, where the central core was attached to the exterior walls by horizontal steel beems sized to both support each floor weight and to strengthen the over all building assembly.

Such construction was adequate to maintain the whole but, as there were no strong vertical columns between the central core and the exterior walls, it was also rather fragile. Crashing an airliner into the Empire State Building would not have brought the entire building down, whereas they only had to weaken the horizontal connecting beams on the floors impacted by the crash and the full load of burning jet fuel.

The result: Each Tower weakened and "pancaked" down from where each airliner struck.