I didn't really have time to respond to you earlier, but I do now.
So you think $900,000 is a reasonable amount for lying about a f@ggot dancing in front of children?
As I said earlier, even if the plaintiff is correct, a judgement of $900,000 for a mentally ill nobody f@ggot is insane. What is this nutcase's reputation worth? I'm betting it is worth *NOTHING*.
I think this case has more to do with punishing people who object to perverts putting on sexual displays in front of children, and it has *NOTHING* to do with rendering a fair judgment for an offense.
This is like that billion dollar judgement against Alex Jones. It has nothing to do with reasonable or rational, and everything to do with punishing people who do not accept what the "authorities" demand they accept.
So you are gonna bitch about "rationalizing", and the "end justifies the means"?
These are not even approximately equal to the injustice of what *THEY* are doing.
I have a lot of principles, and some have a higher priority than others. Do you know what my highest principle is? That I should protect my family from threats to their lives and their futures.
I value this principle far more than I do the principle of being fair to people, especially political enemies who are also nutcase perverts.
Yeah you just confirmed my “ends justifies the means” comment.
You think it’s alright to lie about someone cause they’re a f@ggot. You’ll notice I never said anything about the amount of the judgement. Yes it’s just as extreme as the Alex Jones judgement.
Sounds to me like you’re the one bitching. I calmly stated an opinion you didn’t like. Now call me some kind of name. I get the feeling you want to.
Correct.