And the *FACT* that they didn't use those words in their holding is completely lost on you.
What does it cost to add two words and for the purpose of a strong clarification?
Rational people can only conclude their omission of those two words was intentional because the Fueller Court would not go so far as to claim Wong Kim Ark was a natural citizen.
He was clearly a 14th amendment citizen. Nothing else.
It is *YOU* people who keep trying to put words in there that are *NOT* in there.
You have accused me of not responding to your “arguments”, and this is a perfect example of why. First, because you make no valid arguments, and second, you are not amenable to reason, and no matter what anybody tells you, you ain’t gonna change your mind.
The issue you raised is the same one raised in Ankeny, and a Judge and an appeals court, explained why the Birther argument was nothing more than “conclusory, non-factual assertions or legal conclusions.” In other words, Birthers just made up a lot of crap. If you ain’t gonna listen to a judge, and an appeals court, and numerous ones at that, then nothing that I say to you, and nothing that anyone else says to you, is going to do anything but go in one ear and out the other.
You are nothing but a form of Sovereign Citizen. You get stopped for no tags, license or insurance, and you argue with the cops for 30 minutes, and you show them SCOTUS cases, and the UCC code, and a bunch of other quasi-legal crap. You get pulled from the car and arrested. You go to Court and the judge tells you, “Nope, you gotta have tags, a driver’s licence and insurance to drive a car.” You appeal, and you lose again - but you just keep on driving without a licence, and telling others that they don’t gotta have no stinkin’ driver’s licence, either!
That is you, and you have been doing it for 16 years, and you keep repeating the same drivel over and over again, as if repetition will make it true. I have no doubt but that, 16 years from now, you will still be doing the same thing. And you will never win the first case in court. What is at play here, is not the LAW, but your mental illness.
I suggest that maybe, over the next 16 years, that you sign up for online law school. In California, that is enough to sit for the bar. It might take several years of doing it part-time, at night, and in four or five years, you should be able to pass the classes.
Then, if you still believe your foolishness, you can actually go to court, for yourself! But what I think will happen, as you come to understand the legal process, is that you will realize what a nincompoop you have been, and in the process your mental health issues will have begun to abate. Or not. But at least you will have a law licence to show for your time!