Notes From the Democratic Fever Dream — Hillary Pens NYT Op-Ed on How Kamala Can Beat Trump

PJ Media ^ | 24 July 2024 | Stephen Kruiser

[Rummyfan]

There is nothing wrong with calling one's political opponents crazy if they are, in fact, crazy.

The Democratic elites in the United States of America are a toxic combination of pathological liars and unhinged. Just look around. A prime example of unhinged behavior would be the "Free Palestine" protesters who decided to deploy maggots to express their displeasure with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's address to Congress, which Athena wrote about.

Democratic officials continually try to portray the "Free Palestine" loons as a radical fringe that isn't representative of their values, which is a perfect example of the aforementioned lying. As I said in my most recent "Kruiser Kabana Podcast," they're actually the Democratic base.

This combination leads them to inhabit a bizarro world that is less reality-based than a Harry Potter movie.

Which brings me to this. On Wednesday, The New York Times — aka The Official Publication of the Democratic National Committee — published a guest Op-Ed by Hillary Clinton in which two-time presidential race loser (she was the heavy primary fave in 2008, so that counts) gives advice on how Kamala Harris can win.

As with everything Granny Maojackets offers for public consumption, there's perfunctory excuse-making and blame for her 2016 loss, followed by the kind of spin that I continue to insist that she finds at the bottom of a box of wine.

[Rummyfan]

The New York Times:

I know a thing or two about how hard it can be for strong women candidates to fight through the sexism and double standards of American politics. I’ve been called a witch, a “nasty woman” and much worse. I was even burned in effigy. As a candidate, I sometimes shied away from talking about making history. I wasn’t sure voters were ready for that. And I wasn’t running to break a barrier; I was running because I thought I was the most qualified to do the job. While it still pains me that I couldn’t break that highest, hardest glass ceiling, I’m proud that my two presidential campaigns made it seem normal to have a woman at the top of the ticket.

[Wuli]

Advice is worthless from the person who created the Russian collusion hoax and still lost to Trump.

[butlerweave]

If only democrats get to vote and no one else Harris might win ,LOL

[Opinionated Blowhard]

LOL. Listen to Hillary, Kamala! She knows what she’s talking about. Follow her strategy. In fact, hire her campaign advisers.

[Opinionated Blowhard]

I know a thing or two about how hard it can be for strong women candidates to fight through the sexism and double standards of American politics. I’ve been called a witch, a “nasty woman” and much worse.

Here we go again. "A strong man is called a leader. A strong woman is called a b__ch." That is her favorite line. No, Hillary, a strong woman is called a leader too. An obnoxious, entitled, self-absorbed woman is called a b__tch. And an obnoxious, entitled, self-absorbed man is called an a___hole. If, in the spirit of gender equality, you want us to call you an a___hole instead of a b___tch, I'd be happy to do it.

[neverevergiveup]

If, in the spirit of gender equality, you want us to call you an a___hole instead of a b___tch, I'd be happy to do it.

Lol!

[Rummyfan]

If, in the spirit of gender equality, you want us to call you an a___hole instead of a b___tch, I'd be happy to do it.

Agreed!

[Seaplaner]

I wasn’t sure voters were ready for that.

Might this mean, in other words, that she may neither like nor trust you and needs to hide something from you?

Could this be described as condescending arrogance?

[ridesthemiles]

THERE IS NOTHING NORMAL ABOUT HILLARY-—

ALL THE WAY BACK TO WHEN SHE GOT KICKED OFF THE LEGAL GROUP FOR MAKING UP INFO & CHARGES-—

ALSO-—HER “CATTLE FUTURES” INCOME

[TexasFreeper2009]

Kamala is not a “strong” woman, she simply slept her way to the top.

Hillary however (in my opinion), was a strong woman, but she was also just strongly disliked and listening to her voice was like nails on a chalkboard.

Thatcher was a strong woman, and conservatives had no problem with her.

Liberals like to say we don’t like women or black, and yet we love Clarance Thomas and Thatcher. So maybe it’s just they we don’t like many of the women and blacks that are liberals.

[central_va]

KamelToe is a strong womwn if the MSM says she is a strong woman.

[Sequoyah101]

Her path to winning is a huge steal. Drag all the ballots with names of illegals on them and flood the system as necessary. I don't know why they even bother to gather names and make them look semi-legitimate. Why don't they just make the names up and let-er-rip? Nobody has the means to vet all the ballots in any timely manner even if the courts would hear the arguments. Even if the Supreme Court ruled against the mess somehow who would enforce the ruling?

Cheat, that is their answer. They have left restraint and honesty in the ditch a long time ago. It may not have been the first step but it is the latest and a big one, defiance of the USSC ruling against forgiveness of student debt. Biden did it in a trial run, is doing it again and will get away with it.

[ChessExpert]

Hillary identifies as a victim. Biden identifies as “sharp as a tack.” Kamala identifies as a strong woman. The Democratic party identifies as a protector of freedom.

[Texas resident]

Neither hillary or kamala are strong women. They are abusive power hungry evil people. Difference between the two is that hillary has a long and wide trail of dead people behind her.

[TexasFreeper2009]

say what you want about Hillary, but unlike Kamala at least she didn’t sleep her way to the top!

[Texas resident]

True. But she did marry her gravy train.

[TexasFreeper2009]

can you imagine marrying any woman who you knew was Willie Browns side ho?

*puke*