"I agree that Chris Martenson made some mistakes. Though what where the hollow sounding shots from? I didn’t hear a crack(bullet passing camera) with them." First of all, he had two recordings and chose to use the crappiest one for his analysis. Hmmmm. I've seen people do things like that when using the best evidence doesn't get them where they want to go.
Second, doesn't matter what it sounds like to him on that crappy recording. That's not evidence. There is empirical evidence on these recordings. That's what matters.
"I didn’t hear a crack(bullet passing camera) with them."
The crack is a shockwave from a supersonic bullet. There is a directional aspect to it, yes. But it doesn't need to pass near you to hear it.
"I know Team one the team most seen in video never fired a shot. Team two fired one shot that I know of which did kill Crooks"
Those are the news reports so far. I believe Crooks fired six shots. There are three other shots in that first 16 seconds. The first other shot comes between Crooks' 5th and 6th, the next one a few seconds later. Those are both rifle shots. There is another shot later.
said, "The crack is a shockwave from a supersonic bullet. There is a directional aspect to it, yes. But it doesn't need to pass near you to hear it. it doesn't need to pass near you to hear it"
In Reference to the hollow weapon fire sounds after the first three rounds:
What i'm referring to is the crack sound before you hear the weapon sound. Which is the bullet passing camera before you hear the weapon going off. There was no crack-bang which is a clear sign of a super sonic ballistic fired in the direction or toward the direction of the camera. There was also no bang-crack which suggest the bullets left the weapon and ended up close to the weapon itself.
I would like to see the roof of that building. i suggest someone inside the building fired through the roof pinning or wounding Crooks. Which is fine. I'm just trying to figure out what happened.