"Lady MacBiden" Trump Assassination Attempt: Does Dr Jill Biden Need to be Questioned? (Naomi goes there)

FINALLY, someone actually asserting what we've been citing here FOREVER.

Suddenly a dozen puzzle pieces drop into place.

But one more thing:

But someone made the decision to surround President Trump with tiny female Secret Service agents, at least one of whom cowered behind him while he was being shot at, and who appeared later not to know how to manage her holster.

I've stated it here prior: NO LOYAL ADVISOR would have missed noticing the changing of security.

DJT has a major problem much closer to him than believed, and I can't help but wonder if he has any idea...

Nah, I’ve been wise to her wackiness for a long time:

“Naomi is a real piece of work. After she was called out by her peers for shoddy research resulting in false conclusions in her own supposed field of expertise (radical feminism) beginning with her thesis and then one of her books, and her last book was so riddled with errors her publisher had to pulp all copies, she started jumping on passing bandwagons to get attention. First she veered right and went Tea Party. Then made a sharp left turn and went all in on Occupy Wall Street.

Along the way she started spouting nutty conspiracy theory stuff. For instance, she claimed that ghastly ISIS video showing them beheading the two Americans and two British was a fake created by the CIA and the poor headless guys and their families were all actors, and that American military sent to Africa to help out during the Ebola outbreak were actually being sent there to bring Ebola back to the US to start an epidemic here and topple the government.

Now she’s jumped on the vax doomer bandwagon. When this finally peters out, who knows, she may turn left again.

And in her new incarnation as vax doomer, she’s been called out for *very* shoddy “research” even by her own fans. Hilariously shoddy. As in can’t do basic math shoddy. Some people don’t care about facts and correct math and lap up every nutty thing she spouts so long as it suits their agendas.”

Link: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4136049/posts?page=66#66

Bottom line: We don’t need to beclown ourselves by promoting this fickle attention hog crackpot. It only makes us look foolish and desperate and our enemies on the left will (and already have) used that to discredit us. We aren’t that desperate. We don’t need her. Better to let her go back to seeking the attention she so craves from the left.

Maybe because they have nothing in common?

Naomi has a clown degree “Doctorate of Feminist Literature” that she’s parlayed into convincing the gullible is a medical doctorate.

Unfortunately for Naomi even that Feminism doctorate might be crumbling due to her failure to do adequate research:

https://www.thesis-editor.co.uk/blog/post/the-importance-of-fact-checking-and-understanding-your-research

25th August 2022

Recently, the author Naomi Wolf learned – on-air, no less – that a major premise of her book is based on a misunderstanding. Her book “Outrages: Sex, Censorship, and the Criminalization of Love” says that men were executed for sodomy – her understanding of the 19th-century English legal term “death recorded.” It does not mean executed, but just the opposite – it means the person is pardoned. The book is a rewrite of her 2015 doctoral thesis at Oxford, which begs the question: how did it get this far without her misunderstanding being cleared up by someone?

Granted, we don’t know just how deep she delved into this in her dissertation, but the fact remains that she never bothered to even look for the basic definition of “death recorded,” as the on-air interviewer Matthew Sweet did. If she had, she would have clearly seen that it did not mean what she thought it did. Wolf went on to cite several articles on Twitter from AD Harvey, a historian known as a hoaxer and who has created, among other things, a fake community of academics. You can imagine how well this has gone over.

Many academics collectively cringed when they heard Wolf, and posted on social media their horror and fear of this happening to them - not to mention their amazement that she managed to do doctoral work on this without ever learning the correct meaning of the term. The thing is, though, this was an easy thing to avoid. Knowing your research – and this means if you don’t understand something, looking it up or asking a knowledgeable person in the field – can help you avoid being in a similar situation. Here are some other ways you can help avoid this situation for yourself

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.