Posted on 07/15/2024 8:58:33 AM PDT by blueyon
THIS
They were allowed to do that last month, or up until this Get Trump operation was authorized.
They could shoot the gun out of his hands, shoot the roof nearby.
No, not feasable. And also... why? Why a big effort not to completely stop him?
A. Create atrocious economic conditions.
B. Hire some out-of-work knuckleheads for good money.
I don’t believe this is true, because it makes no sense for the SS. {It can make sense for snipers in other situations, but not this.) It’s a lie.
We should be having sworn Congressional public hearings TODAY.
“Really there is no point anymore. Democrats refuse to attend and DOJ will not prosecute any referrals. “
There have to be meetings before these events to get things coordinated. This can't all be done orally. There has to be a paper trail.
he must have been and and they should have kept trump off the stage till they took the roof-top guy into custody.
Fair play for assassins.
Thx !
LOCAL police could not fire on their own.
NEEDED “APPROVAL” from SS.
CRAZIEST THING I EVER HEARD.
Jonathan Willis is a former US Navy veteran and a Fire Lieutenant/Paramedic who has been involved in various fields, including real estate and firearms training. He has gained attention recently due to a widely circulated post on 4chan, where he claimed to be the sniper who was assigned to protect Donald Trump during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.
According to the post, Jonathan Willis had the assassin in his sights for at least 3 minutes but was prevented from taking the shot by the head of the Secret Service. He stated that he did not follow the orders and returned fire despite strict instructions not to engage.
It is essential to note that the authenticity of the post has not been verified, and many have questioned its legitimacy. The Secret Service has not commented on the matter, and the incident remains under investigation.
This cannot be true.
It’s Friday, but Sunday’s coming...
The point right now would be to make sure that the Deep State isn’t able to hide the truth, alter records, and lie their way out of this so that the public doesn’t rise up and elect Trump SO OVERWHELMINGLY that even the election-stealing machine can’t work.
And then, of course, the point is also to collect genuine, unfalsified evidence so that the criminal referrals can be referred either to Trump’s AG or directly to a military tribunal in Gitmo.
They actually are a hate filled, Satan controlled people.
The media paints a picture and the dumb sheep believe it.. The result is a list people who are apt to do anything.
And gun ownership has nothing to do with psychos getting a weapon to kill.
I.. And many more.. Are FED UP with the loose, insane, walking around.. On tv network.. Newsmedia... Selling Satan’s lies.. You all should be grounded for attempted assassination of Trump. He will be back in the oval office and we can take as many on a one way plane, back home. And another plane ride for all you haters. You just can’t tolerate a good man..
I call Bovine Scatology on this one, no one in their right mind would work a Protective Detail if this is the case, even that SS lady who couldn’t pull her weapon out of it’s holster.
She should be polishing up her DEI resume now. Give that female buff shine.
..If the cops were walking up to your door - for some little matter - and your dog got out, they’d be firing away like it was the O.K. Corral..
But when it’s Donald Trump’s life?.. “nahh.. stand down, let him take his shot first..”
I have a question that’s not why was the building not guarded but HOW DID THE SHOOTER KNOW THE BUILDING WASN’T GUARDED?
This doesn’t seem to make any sense.
I posted this in response to this reporting:
You or our source are full of dung. If a weapon is brought to bear upon the asset, you are free to engage. In point of fact, if any person in the crowd had a firearm and saw Crooks take aim at Trump, they would be well within the law to fire upon the crooked perp. 9.502 – 9.506 JUSTIFICATION: USE OF FORCE/DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF OTHERS. While I don’t practice law in PA, this law is almost universal because it makes sense.
If what you say is true, then, why even have Secret Service Protection? You’d be better off having your friends, constituents, and relatives out protecting you under the authority bestowed upon them by Pennsylvania law. Maybe Kennedy is lucky not to have SS protection.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.