Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: old school
Trump doesn’t need a substantive running-mate to win.

Yet Trump says this is his second criteria.

And I do think it matters.

If it is Biden/Harris, maybe not so much as it is simply a grudge match between the two and Biden loses.

If it is Harris and someone else, I think Trump needs a woman to help counter. ESPECIALLY if Harris were to pick Whitmer. Two men vs two women would be horrible optics.

And Harris cannot pick Newsome as they are both from California.

And if Democrats skip Harris, all bets off.

45 posted on 07/13/2024 11:35:47 AM PDT by Reno89519 (I'll go out on a limb: Trump & Gabbard 2024 or Trump & Sanders 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Reno89519

Short of picking a pedophile priest, Trump’s gonna win!

In any event it’s a choice we’re going to have to live with.

A truly Godly person (not someone who Jesus would spit-out) would ease my mind.

I don’t trust any of the named prospects except Carson!


65 posted on 07/13/2024 11:52:12 AM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Reno89519

I agree with you that Trump’s pick should be a woman. In fact I had Sanders and Gabbard on my list too along with Elise Stefanik. Had she not gotten embroiled in the dog killing controversy I would have put Kristi Noem in the running too.


68 posted on 07/13/2024 11:53:57 AM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson