Tulsi would certainly be the most interesting choice, and not the worst either.
Of the names continually being thrown around, Burgum is by far the very worst possible option. Rubio is next worst.
—>Tulsi would certainly be the most interesting choice, and not the worst either.</i>
................... collected....................
She literally said “Trump is a warmonger” during the primaries in 2020. He was not AT ALL. He had historic peace agreements.
Here are some of her views, some are good with me, some aren’t.
-She has 0% rating from the NRA (and supported banning common sporting rifles).
-She has a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood
-and a 100% rating from NARAL.
-Lt. Colonel in the US Army Civil Affairs and PSYchological OPerations Command
-Pro automatic voter registration for all citizens.
-Pro statehood for DC
-Anti photo ID to vote
-Pro abolition of electoral college
-Pro Iran Nuke Deal
-Anti nuclear power and supports shutting down existing reactors
-Anti fracking
-Pro Paris Climate Accords
-Pro subsidies and mandates for “green” homes
-Pro subsidies for wind/solar
-Pro climate change agenda
-Anti Gulf drilling
-Anti fossil fuels
-Pro free college tuition
-Pro minimum wage
-Anti school voucher
-Anti cash bail
-Anti private prisons
-Anti death penalty
-Anti minimum sentencing
-Pro institutionalization of racist “anti-racism”
-Pro LGBT, gay marriage
-Anti conversion therapy
-Pro feminist and “women’s rights” whatever that means. Talks about the fake pay gap.
-Pro legal abortion
-Pro federal funding for abortion
-Pro “assault weapon” bans
-Pro minimum wage
-Pro socialized healthcare
-Pro reparations
-Member of the CFR
-Klaus Schwab acolyte
-Check out whose name is included on CRAFTING AN INFORMATION WARFARE AND COUNTER-PROPAGANDA STRATEGY FOR THE EMERGING SECURITY ENVIRONMENT
https://i.imgur.com/pqkELky.png
Burgum being endorsed by Rove was the Kiss of Death for me.
