Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texan4Life
An interesting (long) article on one of the two main characters, Sarah Page.

A non-event blown out of proportion by personal agendas and a corrupted power structure.

https://www.centerforpublicsecrets.org/post/the-notorious-sarah-page

excerpts:

On Memorial Day 1921, a young, white Tulsa, Oklahoma elevator operator named Sarah Page had a confrontation with a black teenager named Dick Roland. The incident in Tulsa’s downtown Drexel Building soon spiraled into the Tulsa Race Massacre of 1921. Much like Roland himself, Page remains known today only through the accumulated legend of sparse news articles and the speculations of historians. As it turns out, most of Sarah Page’s legend is untrue. Fortunately, it is now possible to meet the real person at the center of Tulsa’s race war.

...A day later, the likely cause of the elevator rage was transformed into the Tulsa Tribune’s tale of attempted sexual violence. Sarah’s aggressive purse-wielding was replaced by a hapless young orphan’s scratched face and torn clothes. The Tribune’s managing editor later admitted that these inflammatory claims were untrue. Sarah Page was not responsible for inventing them. She did not mention them to her neighbor Anna Green. Green didn’t mention them in her interview with the Tribune. The police talked to Sarah on Monday and would have noticed scratches. A torn dress or blouse would have been Exhibit A. According to the police, Sarah denied those claims on Tuesday, June 1, and had not filed charges against Roland as of June 2.

...If neither Sarah Page nor Clarence Poulton were responsible for inflating the story, then who was? All trails lead to the 1921 Tulsa police force, headed by chief John Gustafson.

The police were likely telling the truth in the beginning when they claimed that they were far from convinced a crime had been committed on Monday. They were also likely telling the truth at the end, when they announced on Wednesday that Page had denied the Nab Negro article was true in its details and, further, that Page’s version was substantially the same as Roland’s. It was in the middle where they lied.

...Chief of Detectives Jim Patton headed the investigation. On Wednesday, while the embers still glowed in Greenwood, he delivered a statement to the Daily World calling Jones’ Nab Negro article yellow journalism, colored and untrue, and as having incited a disastrous racial spirit. Patton concluded that “If the facts in the story as told the police had only been printed I do not think there would have been an (sic) riot whatever.”

...In other words, if the Tribune had only printed Sarah Page’s story, there would have been no event now called the Tulsa Race Massacre.

29 posted on 07/12/2024 5:59:20 PM PDT by yelostar (TRUMP and only TRUMP 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yelostar
Another important point is that there was a new afternoon/evening paper in Tulsa sensationalizing stories to sell papers. That day’s issue had a front page story and an inside option piece / editorial. I think there is a copy of the article somewhere. However no known copy of the editorial exists. The copy of the day’s edition in the library has it cut out.

For decades Tulsa ignored the disturbance so the city could develop. Now leftist elements are using it to stir strife.

31 posted on 07/12/2024 7:01:43 PM PDT by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: yelostar

So in other words the media lied and people died.

When are we going to hold these liars and murderers acountable?


33 posted on 07/13/2024 10:37:22 AM PDT by Ban Draoi Marbh Draoi ( Gen. 12:3: a warning to all antisemites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson