[janetjanet998]

At time 5:20, the removal of “...and in addition to that, I have more Blacks in my administration than any other president, all other presidents combined, and in major positions, cabinet positions.”

At time 14:15, in reference to Donald Trump’s call for the death penalty for the Central Park Five, the removal of “I don’t know if they even call for their hanging or not, but he–but they said [...] convicted of murder.”

[janetjanet998]

So the White House gave them
Questions to ask in advance and demanded edits

LOL

This is becoming worse than I even thought

[gibsonguy]

The only time this happened l’m sure.

[cgbg]

The children got their hands caught in the cookie jar—again!

[alternatives?]

“progressive” never hard left.

[HollyB]

“ non-substantive”?

This was significant and would have proven once again what we are dealing with.

[1Old Pro]

Civic Media, a Wisconsin-based progressive talk-radio network, said Thursday it had agreed to make two edits to an interview with President Joe Biden at the request of his campaign before the broadcast aired, a decision the station fell short of "journalistic interview standards."

They all do it, Lester Holt's interview is next.

[NWFree]

Fake media said they would also help prop up President Retard just like all the other fake media

[uranium penguin]

I really think that any “interview” where the radio host is supplied the questions they are to ask the candidate should be considered a Campaign contribution.

And any radio station that does not disclose that kind of info up front really should face some sort of fines.

[ridesthemiles]

ELECTION INTERFERENCE.....

[hanamizu]

Civic Media management immediately undertook an investigation and determined that the production team at the time viewed the edits as non-substantive and broadcast and published the interview with two short segments removed,”

---

If the edits were non-substantive, why would the WH ask for them to be removed?

[faithhopecharity]

amazing just how incompetent the anti-American conspirators and their Useful Idiots in the media can be, sometimes anyways

[T.B. Yoits]

Edited? Then it's not an interview but an advertisement - an illegal political contribution-in-kind.

Either the Jao Bai-din campaign pays for the ad and the radio station identifies it as an advertisement, with equal time given to all other candidates, or let the station owners and interviewers all face charges.

Also, Jao Bai-din's campaign reimburses the taxpayers for jet fare as it's a campaign promotion, not an interview.

[bigbob]

Their Madistan station was formerly WTTN aka “Devil Radio”.

[Romulus]

Sanitized for your protection.

[Rinnwald]

Media as government spittoon is the heart of “our democracy”.