Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rightwingcrazy
Unverifiable elections are not really elections at all. They’re just a variation on might-makes-right.

Isn't it interesting that in rules of evidence for trial, a break in the chain of custody makes the evidence invalid. Yet in votes, there is no chain of custody requirement on the ballots, no citizenship verification requirement, no auditable evidence of valid voting, nothing.

Nothing except, "I won and you didn't."
15 posted on 07/11/2024 11:34:04 AM PDT by Phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Phlyer
Isn't it interesting that in rules of evidence for trial, a break in the chain of custody makes the evidence invalid. Yet in votes, there is no chain of custody requirement on the ballots, no citizenship verification requirement, no auditable evidence of valid voting, nothing.
Nothing except, "I won and you didn't."


"I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how."
-Josef Stalin
16 posted on 07/11/2024 12:14:44 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson