Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27
"The Reagan campaign hoped the move would help win delegates from the state, make him more attractive to liberals and moderates at the convention in Kansas City, Mo., and ultimately improve his odds in the general election against Democratic candidate Jimmy Carter."

That went well......Man, how we suffered during the carter years.

Remember waiting in line for gas? No Christmas lights and that stupid sweater speach? Billy beer? The hunting trip (that was great)!

Today it's lies. They lie about the price of groceries. I hear from people shopping all the time how bad it is. Eggs $8 a dozen. The lies, the economy. Lying about covid.

If biden wins again it'll be worse than now.

16 posted on 07/11/2024 9:11:32 AM PDT by Indy Pendance (Jesus can't get here soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Indy Pendance
That went well......

Reagan was probably never going to beat the incumbent President Ford, regardless of who he picked for VP. The primaries were over and the projected delegate count had Ford winning. Well over half the uncommitted delegates were in NY, NJ and PA. Reagan thought Schweiker would secure PA, and possibly bring NY or NJ. Picking a conservative from any of those states would only have secured 1 state, and no other delegates he didn't win anyway.

In the end, I suspect his loss was a blessing. Reagan quite possibly would have lost to Carter, and we might never have had his 2 terms as POTUS.

40 posted on 07/11/2024 11:24:02 AM PDT by ETCM (“There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil.” — Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson