Just a dog and pony show to distract from Biden.
This jerk should focus on his state, not Trump. Anyway, it’s a toss up between Schiff and Schumer as to who should be droned first.
This is so stupid.
Any ruling by the chair in the Special Joint Session can be appealed to the floor, such a motion takes precedence over any other motion. Pence had zero authority independent of the floor.
With 535 individuals voting, one man, one vote, Members and Senators equal, it would have taken 268 votes to set aside at least 37 Biden Electors - and if you think that could have happened, there’s something wrong with you.
No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
Nothing says “democracy” like ex post facto bills of attainder.
I’ll tell you, in one word, what the Demos fear more than anything else ... “RICO”. And RICO findings will raise the ire of the American people more than almost anything else.
Schumer trying to change the headlines...
If only congresscritters, especially the ones like this slimeball, could face expulsion for knowingly passing unconstitutional legislation. This is a de facto bill of attainder on its face.
Oooohhhh....they soooo want President Trump back in the news....
Facially unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including separation of powers, and also based on the proposed law’s ex post facto status.
Political noise to foment outrage and distract from the Democrats’ sinking Presidential ship.
The Supreme Court did not grant Trump immunity. They simply showed where The Constitution extended it.
How would this not be ex post facto law. Unconstitutional on its face.
Schmuck is smart enough to know that ex post facto laws are Constitutionally prohibited. The Demoncrat base this garbage is aimed at will eat it up.
Schumer, invoking Congress’s powers to regulate the courts, said Democrats are working on legislation to classify Trump’s efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 election as “unofficial acts”
I am not a lawyer but I am quite certain grabbing a judicial power (to decide whether a case meets the requirement of the law) and making it a legislative one is not what is meant by “To regulate the courts.”
It would take an amendment to the Constitution to take away the immunity of any and all presidents.
The corrupt commie pig is scared to death of losing his yob mahn. FUCHUCK.
My gawd, the audacity of people like him. Their criminal endeavors know no bounds......
Facially unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including separation of powers, and also based on the proposed law’s ex post facto status.
Political noise to foment outrage and distract from the Democrats’ sinking Presidential ship.
What part of the constitutional immunity does he not understand? That’s like passing a law saying Trump doesn’t have free speech.
Nothing more than a publicity stunt by a Democrat trying to change the subject.
Sounds like chuckie needs a talking to.