[kabar]

There are so many permutations that affect any solutions. And you don't have to be a conspiracist to believe that there is an internal war going on within the Dem Party. The Dems moved the convention way back into August while pushing for the earliest Presidential debate ever, i.e., before either candidate was nominated.

It is obvious, at least to me, that one faction within the Dems wanted the flexibility to switch Biden out. That faction was supported by the MSM, which immediately jumped into the fray to force Joe out. The debate was either an audition or a pretext to get rid of Biden. But it is not going to be easy.

The DNC insured that Biden would not be challenged in the primary. The wanted to retain the power to choose their own candidate and not leave it up to the Dem electorate. They miscalculated that Jill and Hunter would throw a monkey wrench into their plans. It is going to be an interesting Summer.

Sundance has the theory that in order to steal the election again, the Dems must replace Biden with a "plausible" winner. It will be difficult to convince people that Biden was the winner again despite his declining medical condition. On the other hand, they migt not care about the public perception as long as they retain the WH. The ends justify the means.

[DanZ]

Sundance has the theory that in order to steal the election again, the Dems must replace Biden with a "plausible" winner

I wonder what a 5%-10% stock market correction in Aug-Nov timeline will do to the Propaganda narrative

[chiller]

re: ‘plausible ‘ candidate.

Agreed Biden is not. Kamala can read a teleprompter, so with busy script writers she could be considered plausible.

There’s still more to it, though. I think we’ll get a chance to see, but for now I’m with Joe !