The best book on this subject is a hard read—but worth the effort:
https://www.amazon.com/Transhumanism-Grimoire-Alchemical-Scott-Hart/dp/1936239442
Hags to fags to trannies.
Mark Steyn once opined that feminism could only have been invented by 12 year old boys:, free love, no bras, women paying their own way…
Honestly, it could be “how the sexual revolution led to all this nonsense”.
Or, The Pill, or, better condoms, and hippiedom. All basically late ‘60s.
We have become obsessed with sex, above all else, most important while being glib about it, and it’s no wonder homosexuals were likewise included and encouraged in this hedonism, and then anything truly goes. Hedonism Uber alles.
“3 Ways Feminism Laid The Groundwork For Transgenderism”
Translate into Street Language: “3 ways Broads voting Laid the Groundwork for cutting the dicks off of little boys”
The idea that they can do anything as good as a man, if not better.
Feminism?
More like Masculinism.
“the feminist vision was to help women become more like men“
This is evident watching old movies and tv shows. Female characters who go into gratuitous long winded speeches about hew they like to knock off a piece and move on.
As if the man is not sacrificed to the husband and father.
These loons had no appreciation for the work of the Creator.
I would vigorously argue with the absolutism of this claim. It was the too-large undertow of spouse and child abuse that "no one" was talking about untll the 1980s that animated much of the arguments against marriage. If emotional, physical and sexual abuse had not been significant problems, the anti-marriage outflow would not have taken hold.
That said, incremental improvements to society would have been worthy campaigns. So-called feminism need not have “thrown it all away.” Liberalism always goes too far.
Shelley was a brilliant poet; and also an avowed atheist and free-love proponent who catted around extensively under this philosophy.
I would argue that this interpretation of de Beauvoir's statement goes too far. Beauvoir was speaking in poetic license or hyperbole about the gendered role expectations placed on women, that stratifed social roles of males and females are taught and reinforced from childhood onward.
While I have not read her extensively, I doubt she believed that biological sex is possible to completely erase, as today's transgenderist loons apppear to believe. Rather, she argues for the "spectrum" of mental and emotional traits, from mostly F to mostly M, upon which individuals can be characterized through their inborn propensities.
Individuals' choices in life (identification) can certainly move that needle in one direction or another via beliefs or behaviors; but cannot change genetic sex or DNA.
Also a non-Christian.
Bingo. The medical weaponization of cultural marxist sex. The Supreme Court in the early 70s helped spread the various forms of birth control beyond the doctor's office, where it had been reserved for married women, out into the general population, which in turn enabled and supported the practices of unmarried sex, cohabitation and what was formerly known as illegitimacy.The arrival of the Pill and other modes of birth control slowly but steadily changed heterosexuals’ view of sex. There was a massive psychological shift away from viewing reproduction as the primary purpose of sexual activity to focusing solely on sex for personal pleasure. This move made it intellectually difficult for heterosexual couples who used contraception to fundamentally distinguish their relationship from that of a homosexual union. Both, albeit for different reasons, were sterile.