Posted on 07/03/2024 8:46:22 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
I believe it 100%, Trump’s progress with black voters and young voters would immediately disappear. She could peel off reluctant Trump support.
People who think Kamala is unelectable are failing to grasp the full court press from media and big tech to gaslight everyone obo the First Woman and Second African American President and the sheer stupidity of millions of middle aged wine moms.
Kamala is only two points behind Trump in a recent poll. The MSM will do a massive “celebrity makeover” for her.
I dont think that will matter.
Biden rigged the 2020 primaries against Bernie Sanders, and then all the Sanders supporters dutifully supported Biden.
If we don't know upfront whether a candidate is eligible for an office, shouldn't we require adequate vetting before placing them on the ballot?
Unfortunately, as many are just now learning, a "high trust" society becomes vulnerable, when importing persons of descent from "low trust" societies.
Don't get mad, get educated.
Kamala Harris Ineligible Website (downloadable PDF available via link)
Don’t underestimate Kamala. The media has immense power to reshape her image for low information voters. They’ve already been doing it in a low intensity way for several months, inserting her into news stories about Ukraine, the G7, etc.
But what else would you expect from the Party of Slavery and Infanticide?
NBC kooks are stubborn fools.
They claim Kamala is ineligible. And yet they have nothing to say when asked why Obama was elected. Twice.
Do some research, and get better educated on this subject.
___________________________________________
I did my research as ordered. And here’s what I found.
Barack Insane Obama served 2 terms as the US president.
What say you to that?
That’s the thing. I am and you’re wrong.
This time, relative to Kamala, we do.
It only awaits persons to view it.
Kamala Harris Ineligible Website (downloadable PDF available via link)
They’re one step above “sovereign citizens,” if that.
Is this the extent of your "discussion" skills?
Do you have an ability, to stay on-topic?
If we don't know upfront whether a candidate is eligible for an office, shouldn't we require adequate vetting before placing them on the ballot?
You didn't answer the question. But I'll answer your question...
236. There were 236 separate legal challenges to to Obama's NBC status. You know how many of those challenges failed?
Yep. 236. Is that vetting enough for ya?
Is that the best you can do? Reposting again and again your little clickbait link?
You’re a troll. A one trick trolling pony.
The distinction between Obama and Kamala, is her parent's lack of "residence" (which was part of the Wong Kim Ark ruling).
To restate the issue and question:
US citizenship requires "residence" and "jurisdiction" of a parent at the time of birth, per statutes and court rulings.
These rights were signed away by the parents of Kamala Harris in exchange for US entry on a student visa, under rules which existed prior to the 1965 Immigration Act.
These terms included a restriction of entry to children born in the US to one parent of Asian origin, requiring them to register as a alien.
The question is: Can someone born an "alien" to the US, be a "natural born citizen" as required by the constitution to be VP or President?
Please answer that.
C'mon man, you're a lying dog-faced pony soldier, I'll sic Corn Pop on ya...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.