Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roadcat
They'll rule that "paying hush money to a ho is personal and not official".

I don't like it, but I'm pretty sure that's how it'll shake out.

18 posted on 07/02/2024 9:35:31 AM PDT by knarf (BEC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: knarf

Non disclosure agreements are legal. Done all the time. The story had been out for years and effect on election already factored in. Even if it were to enhance image for election rather than to protect Melania from pain as Cohen testified that is not illegal. The whole case is bogus for many add’l reasons.
The immunity decision just gives the case one more blow since presidential conversations were illegally entered into the court testimony.


23 posted on 07/02/2024 9:55:31 AM PDT by JayGalt (DEI = Didn’t Earn It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: knarf
They'll rule that "paying hush money to a ho is personal and not official".

But the payments began after Trump became President. The supposed illegal bit was that the hush money was to affect the outcome of the election. But no money was paid out prior to the election, so no hush money, so no illegality. This whole thing was a sham. It doesn't matter if it was personal or official, no illegal act happened.

27 posted on 07/02/2024 10:23:09 AM PDT by roadcat ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson