The Hill writer got it wrong— it is NOT up to the lower court to ‘decide if it merits the immunity”— the immunity is described in detail as being a power the President retains. What the lower court has to decide is whether to dissolve the case BECAUSE the evidence used to make a case was illegal, and to determine whatever else in their case is covered by immunity, and thus-— there can be no furtherance of a prosecution. PERIOD.
What a stupid a@@ writer putting their own spin on the plainly written easy to understand syllabus and Decision and all Concurrences and Dissents therein. Arrogant jerk writer- doesn’t get it— the SCOTUS is not going to review their freaking case- they were responding to a Certoriari writ emergently presented to the Court.
I saw the Psaki interview with Nazi Pelosi last night where by she claimed the USSC sat on the immunity decision for 6 months because they’re in cahoots with the Trump campaign. That silly slut apparently didn’t realize the SC didn’t even hear arguments on the case until the end of April. She lies with impunity but because of congressional immunity, she never pays the price. She doesn’t want Trump to have immunity, but it’s okay if professional politicians have it. Sounds like some ppl ARE above the law.