Roberts wants to write the Trump immunity opinion so he can boast that he wrote it.
I expect at least 3 concurring opinions. Could be a unanimous decision in order to present a unified court opinion.
Will be interested to see if the opinion addresses Jack Smith’s unconstitutional and unlawful appointment.
I would think this means that Barrett does not have the First Amendment cases.
See? Court watchers guess wrong just as often as everyone else.
The government argued that the six-year statute of limitations had already passed and Corner Post could not challenge the rule, but the court today holds that because Corner Post filed its challenge within six years of when it was injured by the rule, its challenge was not barred by the statute of limitations.
Justice Barrett started her announcement with a joke about how this case was not one that we were here to hear.
Justice Jackson calls the “flawed reasoning and far-reaching results of the Court’s ruling in this case” “staggering.”
She writes that “there is effectively no longer any limitations period for lawsuits that challenge agency regulations on their face.”
IMHO, Jackson is too ignorant to be on the Court.