Posted on 06/29/2024 12:31:09 PM PDT by pigeoninthepark
dementia joe
Tulsi Gabbard at an archery, rifle, and pistol cpmpetition.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQroOJMhROA&t=303s
People change. Tulsi has. Naturally, you’re entitled to your opinion, but she’s been opining all the right stuff for a couple of years, now. Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump used to be democrats, and they changed.
Biden is an angry stubborn senile man and he gets away with because the media and administration officials are protecting him.
Biden also knows that people that want him gone, don’t have any power to make him gone before November 5, 2024. Lets count the ways Biden can be removed.
1) Death/incapacitated- very unlikely and luck isn’t a strategy for the insurgents.
2) Defeating an incumbent President at the democrat convention.( This theory is laughable)
3) House impeachment and Senate conviction- The numbers aren’t there to initiative impeachment charges let alone getting 2/3 for removal.
4) 25th Amendment- it’s a new amendment and I don’t know how it works or if it has ever been used.
5) Biden loses the 2024 election by losing the electoral college vote.
If you had to make a wager with a substantial amount of your money.
Which scenario would you pick as most likely for removing Biden?
I think she’d make an amazing VP for us. My picks are her or Ramaswamy. I’d love Rand, but we need him in the Senate way more. I’d love DeSantis, but I want him to keep Florida stable. My top pick is Tulsi 😉
Based on what? Because she has said things you want to hear? Is that what you mean by "opining all the right stuff"?
You have to look deeper than that. She's a political chameleon, nothing more than an opportunist. In 2016, she endorsed and campaigned for Bernie Sanders. In 2020, she endorsed Biden. In February of this year at CPAC she ran with the same RAT line of "Our Democracy is under attack." Why not say "Our Republic is under attack"?
In 2019, after voting "present" on Trump's impeachment, and after President Trump commended her for voting present, Gabbard said publicly that Trump was unfit to serve.
Just days before this article, she said Trump should be censured.
Oh get serious. President was a Democrat through up to the 2010s. Not sure why we have such a large faction of dummies doing their damnedest to insult & scare new voters away. A lot of people go through a political metamorphosis. Ffs! 🙄
If sociopathic individuals are insane, biden is completely insane...as are his supporters (in politics and in society).
Insane in the membrane!
Oh please!! He was a Democrat for 8 years, from 2001 to 2009. He was an Independent for a year between 2011-2012, and a member of the Reform Party for two years or less from 1999-2001. The rest of his life he's been a registered Republican for a total of at least 26 years.
If you're going to make a claim, at least make sure you have your facts right. I was a Democrat once too, many years ago, but I was a registered Republican for more than 40 years, until January 6th, when I changed to "no party" because the majority of Republicans in Congress voted to sanction unlimited voter fraud on that date.
She could have stayed in Congress, but I sense she left because she knew her constituents were too liberal for her to continue on.
It's a good thing that Democrats don't dare embrace a team like that. :)
She and her husband bought a house in Texas earlier this year. Is that a second house and still retains her home in Hawaii near those too liberal constituents, or did she formally move to Texas and make that her permanent address? I can't find any info as to if or when she moved completely from the blue State of Hawaii to the red State of Texas.
2) is the only option where Rats control the decision. I don’t think its laughable. If Ratland convention delegates are told to jump they’ll only ask how high. Ratland designed their convention rules with superdelegates to cut off any insurgent surprises against the status quo. If there’s to be an insurgency against the incumbent the DNC will order it and say “The people have spoken!”. I think it’s very possible and the cleanest solution if they want to pull that trigger.
3) is the laughable theory while 4) is a step partially into the unknown plus the GOP would be involved in part of the process -””majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide” - so the GOP would be involved. It would not be exclusively at Rat process. Research the whole Nixon-Agnew-Ford-Rockefeller affair not 25th Amendment but the wheels grinding would be similar.
Somewhere some Rat is doing the calculus of what happens to them down ticket. They may decide preserving that the best option. This means option 5) letting Biden lose and spend the next 4 years fighting everything Trump does. Work for a resurgence in 2028 the voting public is stupid enough to go for that even if Trump does well in his term. The public will think it’s the Rats’ turn now!
This is why I think 2) is their best choice. They control the path with 5) as Plan B.
She endorsed Bernie Sanders in the 2016 race and was anti-2nd Amendment until fairly recently. She has much penance to do before I even begin to trust her. Give her another five years, and see if she’s still singing the right tune.
I will concede to you that my use of laughable on #2 may not be correct.
However, I find the removal of Biden at the convention so unlikely that I might start making bets on it.
Biden has all the democrat delegates and primary wins, plus the democrat popular vote(which is so important to them), but super delegates and a few operators are going to oust Biden.
The party of democracy would allow undemocratic methods to remove Biden? How would they pull this off without becoming a laughing stalk?
My prediction is “Ruth Bader Biden” isn’t resigning and isn’t going anywhere until he’s made to leave the Presidency.
This is why I think 2) is their best choice. They control the path with 5) as Plan B.
*********
I agree with your statement, if they wanted to remove him.
I’m just not sure they’ll even try to remove him.
Both are possible. She chose to remind people of him before senility finished crazy. I'm okay with that.
I’m not sure they’ll try also. If they do (Big if!) I think 2) is the cleanest route for them since they’ll hold all the cards.
Anyway, my current bet is he stays in place. My sense right now is the “debate panic” has peaked and has been calculated into their campaign strategy plans. On to debate 2!
She’s coming along. Almost red pilled. Not quite there yet, since she’s still referring to our constitutional republic as “our democracy,” but she left the Democrat plantation in 2022 to become and independent, and was definitely the only sane person in the last round of Democrat contenders in 2016.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.