Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KamalaKancel

Sorry. No. She was born in the US. She is therefore a natural born citizen and thus eligible to be president. The SCOTUS disagrees with any other interpretation and they have disagreed with any other interpretation for over 100 years. They’re not going to change that interpretation. You might as well accept it rather than constantly tilting at windmills.


60 posted on 06/29/2024 1:11:22 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: FLT-bird
The Supreme Court ruled on this in Minor v. Happersett in 1874, defining "natural born citizens" as those born in the US of citizen parents, and others as "aliens" in immigration terms.

The often-cited Wong Kim Ark of 1898 is used in error, as the plaintiffs parents were legally resident within the USA, whereas Kamala's parents were "non resident aliens" at the time of her 1964 birth.

Courts have not yet ruled on the facts of this matter (but Congress could)!

61 posted on 06/29/2024 4:57:30 PM PDT by KamalaKancel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson